“It is a complicated issue. It is truly a complicated issue, with a wide range of views, truly a wide range of views,” Jean-Pierre said. “There is no ‘yes or no’ answer to this, it is complicated. There is a rule that the Department of Education [DOE] has put forward, and we’re going to let that process move forward, and again, we want to make sure that while we establish guardrails with this rule, we also prevent discrimination, as well, against transgender kids. But again, a complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that.”

“Absolutely no reason for the Biden admin to do this,” New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote. “It is indefensible and embarrassing. The admin can still walk this back, and they should. It’s a disgrace.”

“Honestly, this move by Biden to push a rule on trans kids in sports is not only a backwards betrayal, it [forces] us to have to spend our time dealing with god d*** sports instead of criminal bans on our healthcare,” Alejandra Caraballo, a civil rights attorney and LGBTQ+ advocate, wrote. “He could have just done nothing. This is legitimizing transphobia.”

The mOsT PrOgReSsIvE Administration in History™ funny-clown-hammer “A complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that” funny-clown-hammer Fuck off out of here with that “centrist” nonsense. There’s nothing complicated about it, and it’s not an issue unless you want to turn it into one and want to appeal to people’s emotions like Republicans are doing. It was only a matter of time before they’d start throwing trans people under the bus. I guess with the coming elections it’s as good a time as ever.

  • GiddyGap
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure. Some might think that. But there is still lightyears between those two parties when it comes to LGBTQ priorities. Republicans are just hoping your frustration will cause you to stay home on election day.

      • GiddyGap
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok. You stay home on election day or vote for a Republican. See where that gets you.

            • The differences are so negligible. Democrats will continue the ukraine war, republicans will start shit with mexico and china. that is the only real material difference. I don’t care about promises or lip service, I care about reality, which neither party tries to improve. They’re basically the same party. Always have been. We in hawaii will still be subjected to the exploitation of the monopolies, landlords, and tourist industry while the natives are continually ethnically cleansed. They will plunder us regardless. This is from a democrat stronghold.

              • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m from a different democrat stronghold and the view is the same. Half of the democrats are just the people who would otherwise be republicans, but are savvy to put “fiscally conservative” next to their bio about how intersectional they are.

                They’re so terrified of looking “soft on crime” that they go along with whatever cops want when it comes to policing homeless people. Rather than just saying that they have no intention of making housing for everyone they insist on doing a whole song and dance about how giving the right handouts to developers will totally fix the problem this time.

                When it comes to war they’re the same party, the baseline jingoism surrounding foreign policy allows the mask to slip.

            • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              1 year ago

              Two months into the pandemic democrats were doing covid denial when it came to poll workers just to keep anyone to the left of Reagan out of power within the party. They deliberately killed people to keep power.

          • GiddyGap
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You do know what Congress does, right? The WH is not almighty. Most new laws require congressional approval with 60 votes in the Senate and a majority in the House. Republicans are blocking both.

              • GiddyGap
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Executive orders are futile. Rarely last.

                  • GiddyGap
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    It matters because they can sign bills into law or veto bills. Executive orders rarely last.

            • charly4994 [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              1 year ago

              Strange how all that voting in 2020 did nothing but give Dems a majority that they pissed away. They had opportunity after opportunity to push shit through but somehow got thwarted at every turn. Oh no it’s the Parliamentarian coming in with a steel chair! Oh dear God it’s Sinema and Manchin coming from behind! They could’ve ended the filibuster but never did. Biden could’ve packed the courts but never did. Like at this point what can they do? They’re hobbled by their own masturbatory fantasies of West Wing politicking. In reality it’s a sham. The US was not built to be a democracy, the “Founding Fathers” intentionally tried to obfuscate the voting process to keep it away from the masses. This nation was built on enslavement and genocide and under no circumstances did voting ameliorate their plight. How many wars were waged by indigenous people fighting for their survival as the US continued to break treaties and encroach on their homelands? For some reason the name is not coming to me right now but there was this large civil war fought in the US over slavery that a lot of people like to insist were over states rights. For workers rights the working class paid for it dearly in unmarked graves and terrified screams as workers were locked inside of a burning building. Voting didn’t change any of this, we had to fight for every inch we’ve ever gotten.

            • CombatLiberalism [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              1 year ago

              Interesting how, according to you and nearly every other lib I’ve talked to, the Democrats are simultaneously the only hope against Republican rule but also powerless to stop Republicans whenever they’re in power. Meanwhile Republicans advance their genocidal policies regardless of which party is in charge, but they’re also so weak that the only thing necessary to stop them in their tracks forever is to vote in a Democrat at the next election.

              The observant among us would see that these are contradictory statements. By analyzing those contradictions and finding which one aligns with reality, you could come to a more coherent viewpoint.

            • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There have been multiple instances of Dems controlling both congress and the WH over the last 50 years. Where are our abortion rights? Livable wages? Universal healthcare? Why don’t the Dems actually do shit when they have the opportunity to?

              • GiddyGap
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Democrats have not had a 60-vote supermajority in the Senate to write those things into law. Abortion rights were stable until Trump appointed three justices. Not the Dems fault.

                • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Abortion rights only existed because of a Supreme Court ruling in 1973, which could have been (and was) overturned by another Supreme Court in the future. Rights decided by SC rulings and not codified into law are not, in fact, stable. The Dems have had multiple opportunities since 1973 to codify abortion rights into law and have failed to do so. Yes, the Dem’s fault.

                  And let’s not pretend like the Dems would do anything if they actually had a 60-vote supermajority. They’d find some Manchin or Sinema scapegoat to shoot it down and pin all the blame on.

                  • GiddyGap
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Let’s be real here. It’s the Republicans’ fault if anything.

                    Also, it was different times when Dems had opportunities decades ago. Many Dems were not pro-choice and there has never been a majority within the Democratic Party to pass legislation until recently. It certainly wasn’t a priority since Roe was in place. Now they face a Senate filibuster without 60 votes.

    • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Republicans are just hoping your frustration will cause you to stay home on election day.

      This is literally about the Democrats being worthless craven shitheads as usual. I’m writing in Hillary again in 2024, fuck you.

    • charly4994 [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No they’re not. You have conservative think tanks with a detailed plan about how they’re going to make being trans illegal in the US and you have literally nothing from the leader of the Democrats who is supposedly different in their priorities with queer folk. There hasn’t been any serious attempt at pushback against states criminalizing and going after trans youth. And in the context of years and years of conservative laws across the country eroding our right to exist, they release a statement like this. There is no difference between these people. They just want to be able to call themselves allies because they think it builds character for themselves. Allies cannot dictate our liberation and allies will just as quickly silence their support of us when it becomes a little uncomfortable while we are still here and we still have to live in this shitty country.

      But tell me how it’s all according to keikaku and that the Dems are actually totally on our side guys, just ignore the last 70 years of history.

    • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which LGBTQ priorities? When Biden talks about the rights of queer people, the only thing he brings up is gay marriage when the GOP openly talks about ending the right of trans people to exist as ourselves in public, whi9ch if you knew anything about our lifes and how we need to lead them you’d recognize as openly genocidal. Biden is a coward who doesn’t even dare to say the word trans in public while DeSantis and Abbot are already making lists of trans people. What he has done instead is this shit we’re discussing here, when he could’ve opened up planned parenthood clinics on federal land to guarantee access to free abortion and gender affirming care in red states, could’ve stepped in when Florida "legalized abducting trans kids out of state for forced conversion therapy*, could’ve coordinated the isolated efforts of some democrats on the state level to create asylum states for trans people etc. etc.

      Instead, he is tiptoeing around the “complicated issue” if people like me should have basic human rights.