• Envis10n
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    They are specifically discussing the Pentagon attack, not the entirety of the incidents that occurred on 9/11.

    They also never state it was fake, rather that the story provided doesn’t make a lot of sense so it seems like there is more to it.

      • Envis10n
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t say I agreed with it. Literally just pointing out what was being said in the comments. They didn’t say it was fake, they said the story didn’t make sense to them.

          • Envis10n
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t know, go ask them? I’m not familiar with conspiracy theories to know what the fuck they are talking about.

            The issue is with the misrepresentation of the discussion. The OP says they believe 9/11 was fake, but in the discussion itself they only make vague comments about the “full story” not being told by officials. It doesn’t matter what they are having a hard time believing about the story, or what they think is missing from the story. They didn’t say, or hint at, them believing that 9/11 was “fake”.