I didn’t say I agreed with it. Literally just pointing out what was being said in the comments. They didn’t say it was fake, they said the story didn’t make sense to them.
I don’t know, go ask them? I’m not familiar with conspiracy theories to know what the fuck they are talking about.
The issue is with the misrepresentation of the discussion. The OP says they believe 9/11 was fake, but in the discussion itself they only make vague comments about the “full story” not being told by officials. It doesn’t matter what they are having a hard time believing about the story, or what they think is missing from the story. They didn’t say, or hint at, them believing that 9/11 was “fake”.
They are specifically discussing the Pentagon attack, not the entirety of the incidents that occurred on 9/11.
They also never state it was fake, rather that the story provided doesn’t make a lot of sense so it seems like there is more to it.
Yes, you caught them, it was an ICBM all along.
How does the story not make sense?
I didn’t say I agreed with it. Literally just pointing out what was being said in the comments. They didn’t say it was fake, they said the story didn’t make sense to them.
And I am asking how it does not make sense…?
I don’t know, go ask them? I’m not familiar with conspiracy theories to know what the fuck they are talking about.
The issue is with the misrepresentation of the discussion. The OP says they believe 9/11 was fake, but in the discussion itself they only make vague comments about the “full story” not being told by officials. It doesn’t matter what they are having a hard time believing about the story, or what they think is missing from the story. They didn’t say, or hint at, them believing that 9/11 was “fake”.
Fair enough.