• Neuromancer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Employee has to turn it on.

    The article said it’s mainly because employees have been attacked.

      • Neuromancer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m all fairness that’s the next step. It’s the story of boiling the frog.

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      totally not because employees with knowledge of the store layout, receiving and stocking schedules, policies and procedures, employees and their schedules… would totally never in a million years think about ‘supplementing’ their shitty pay.

      • Neuromancer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Since the employee would have to turn it on, they’d just turn it off if they wanted to steal.

        If they had to have them on all the time. I agree it’d be for employee theft