• nonailsleft
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In rape cases there can be a bit of she said he said and such testimony can be important. However, it’s up to the jury to decide how much weight they attach to such a letter.

    If one of my close friends was accused of rape and I never got any signals that she/he was capable of doing such a thing, I think I should be allowed to be heard. And if I was falsely accused I expect those that know my character to offer the same.

    If I ever get the request from someone I have any doubt about they’re getting the polite middle finger. But if I’m 99% sure they wouldn’t do such a thing I guess I at least owe them to share my pov with the jury. Up to them to weigh everything.

    In this case the actor who portrayed Mr. Red has shown he’s a bad judge of character but it shouldn’t stop us from using the character of the show to make cheff’s kiss memes (not this one though)

    • eric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      However, it’s up to the jury to decide how much weight they attach to such a letter.

      It’s up to the judge. The letters were just used for sentencing, NOT for the verdict, which is the responsibility of the judge, not the jury.

      • nonailsleft
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok then I stand corrected.

        In that case I might be sending a letter how they betrayed my trust & to not go too light on the sentence

    • JD Squared
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re completely missing the point of these letters though. The jury had already found the accused guilty. These letters were for the judge, after conviction. In order to lighten the sentence of a convicted rapist.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      These letters were after conviction, for sentencing.

      Yes, there can be he said, she said. A jury convicts only if convinced beyond all reasonable doubt. They did so on multiple counts. One of the alleged victims, there was sufficient doubt. He was not convicted on that count. So it wasn’t just he said, she said.

      I agree, red likely made an error of judgement. It’s not tantamount to rape, but he’s still advocating for a rapist with the intent of reducing the sentence.