cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/news@lemmy.world/t/488620

65% of U.S. adults say the way the president is elected should be changed so that the winner of the popular vote nationwide wins the presidency.

  • Neuromancer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was designed to be unequal on purpose. The electoral is what keeps us from being ruled by the masses. It should not change.

    • Unaware7013@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So instead we get minority rule. Soooooo much better when the small number of loonies get to derail a functional government with a temper tantrum that ‘the masses’ want.

      It’s a badly designed system, and claiming it’s like this on purpose doesn’t negate how bad the system is. Also, we should not be chained to ideas that came around 250 years ago when other people have improved on the idea and made it less shitty.

      • Neuromancer
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not at all. We are ruled by the states.

        The system is fine. It allows all states to have some say in the process.

        • Unaware7013@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Who gives a fuck about the states’ vote? States are just containers for people, and an excuse that the minority loves to use to explain how they get to rule over majority.

          The electoral college is an undemocratic and broken system that makes my vote in a small state worth more than your vote in a bigger state.

          A vote is a vote, and only losers need to remove the vote from the masses to be able to win. It’s literally the only reason there’s been a Republican president since H.W., and it’s no surprise they’re desperate to keep around the undemocratic voting method that allows them to steal elections they didn’t win.

          • Neuromancer
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wow fascist much?

            States are entities under the government with their own laws.

            We are not a democracy fascist. We are a constitutional republic. The founding fathers had no interest in a rule by the masses nor do i.

            Maybe you should learn the history of our government and why it was designed the way it was rather than pushing weird fascist ideology that states don’t matter and only the federal government counts.

            We’d break as a nation quickly under your ideology.

            • Unaware7013@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              Wow fascist much?

              Lol, you don’t know what words mean and are just trying to sound cool. ProTip: just because you don’t like something doesn’t make it fascist.

              But I would love to see your melted brain actually explain how ‘every citizen having an equal vote’ resembles fascistic tendencies like only protecting the in group, but that would require an actual understanding of fascism.

              The founding fathers had no interest in a rule by the masses nor do i.

              They also didn’t want anyone other than landholding white men to vote, but we’ve realized that’s a stupid idea. The founding fathers didn’t give you a holy document to be reversed, they wrote a framework they expected us to modify.

              Maybe you should learn the history of our government and why it was designed the way it was rather than pushing weird fascist ideology that states don’t matter and only the federal government counts.

              Bold of you to think I don’t understand why they did what they did and still think it’s a bad system. Also, again with the uneducated claim of fascism.

              And you really need to work on your reading comprehension, I said the states’ votes don’t matter, because I think every citizen should vote, not land.

              We’d break as a nation quickly under your ideology.

              Ahahaha, you clearly don’t see how the nation is breaking down around us under the current system.

              • Neuromancer
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                I full support only land owning people voting. I have no issue with that at all.

                It’s obvious you don’t considering you didn’t understand what a stage is or does in our government.

                I read your fascist take just fine. Why I called you a fascist.

                • Unaware7013@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I full support only land owning people voting. I have no issue with that at all.

                  I read your fascist take just fine. Why I called you a fascist.

                  LOL, of course the person who doesn’t understand fascism is perfectly ok with implementing proto-facsist policies. You’re all about the in-group protection and out-group punishment too aren’t you, you pea-brained actual fascist.

                  • Neuromancer
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    10
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    It’s not fascist. It’s how we did it for a long time.

                    You really should learn American history and stop being a fascist.

              • Neuromancer
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                God no. I want a constitutional republic. That’s what America is.

                Personally I wish we’d have more restrictions around voting. The old days of property owners being able to vote is a good idea. I’m not a fan of the poor voting.

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We are ruled by the states.

          Lines on map can’t rule. Only people can.

    • PizzaMan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was designed to be unequal on purpose

      What a convincing argument of its continued existence.

      The electoral is what keeps us from being ruled by the masses.

      It doesn’t do that, all it does is give people in swing states a bigger voice than anybody else, which is a terrible thing for our country.

      Everybody should have a voice, instead it’s just a handful of people in a small set of states.

      • Neuromancer
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t sound like you’re a conservative or believe in a republic.

        A popular vote would mean the costal areas would have the largest vote and rural areas would get ignored.

        It would quickly lead to a breakup up of the union.

        • PizzaMan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Doesn’t sound like you’re a conservative

          I’m not.

          or believe in a republic.

          I do. But ours is in need of reform to make it a better republic that more accurately reflects the will of the people.

          A popular vote would mean the costal areas would have the largest vote and rural areas would get ignored.

          That’s already what happens under the electoral college.

          And every single other electected position in government goes by what is essentially a popular vote, if this was such a problem, all other positions would also be electoral college.

          It would quickly lead to a breakup up of the union.

          The U.S. is the only country that uses an electoral college. All other countries that exist, and are democratic republics use a popular vote and they’re just fine.

          If a popular vote for presidency would cause the destruction of this country, why hasn’t popular vote for all other positions done so already? It’s because this is just fearmongering based on zero evidence. Actually it’s worse, because there is plenty of evidence it wouldn’t do this because of the aforementioned other countries that use popular vote.

          • Neuromancer
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not sure you understand what a republic.

            Every other vote is at a state level. What other position is elected nationally?

            They’re not fine. They’re ok. America is unique and why we are the only super power.

            We only do popular votes at the state level.

            • PizzaMan@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              What other position is elected nationally?

              The level at which the election runs is not what I am getting at.

              We only do popular votes at the state level.

              And they don’t destroy our country despite our states having a rural/urban divide. So our federal elections should be no different.

              • Neuromancer
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                The level makes a difference. We are a combination of states.

                Popular vote for the president would destroy our country. It’s not going to happen unless we are ready for the nation to break up. The smaller states will leave.

                • PizzaMan@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The level makes a difference.

                  No it doesn’t. If a popular vote would destroy this country because of the imbalance between rural/urban areas, then it would have already done so on a state level.

                  • Neuromancer
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You’ve yet to make compelling argument as to why we would change a system that works perfectly.

    • EGG_CREAM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have the senate, which is needed to pass any law and gives equal representation to the states. We have the supreme court, which can strike down any law as unconstitutional. We have plenty of checks on mob rule without disenfranchising a gigantic swath of voters.

    • Physnrd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then why don’t we institute the “Wyoming Rule?” It’s not “rule by the masses” but much more representative of what the population wants.

      • Neuromancer
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or why don’t we just keep the system that works and has kept the country running. Why change something when it works as designed ?

        • PizzaMan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why change something when it works as designed ?

          This argument could unironically have been used to support the continued use of gas chambers in Nazi Germany.

          Just because something is “working” as designed doesn’t mean we should keep using it. If the design is terrible then it needs replaced.

          • Neuromancer
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Godwins law.

            The design is fine. It keeps us stable as a nation.

            Also it’ll never pass. 3/4 of the states will never approve it. It’s a non-starter