• Quatity_Control
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s more about you than the level of air suitable for protecting chips or shrinkflation.

    • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s more about the 20% of my chips being broken due to bags with too little air.

      • Quatity_Control
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Do you think more air will protect more chips? Do you not think there is a point where too much air allows the chips to move around too much in transport and thus you get more broken chips? A point of diminishing returns?

        • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Do you think more air will protect more chips?

          Yes

          Do you not think there is a point where too much air allows the chips to move around too much in transport and thus you get more broken chips?

          No

            • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              You got a source that more air breaks chips? Cause that’s an absurd claim.

                • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I’ve almost certainly studied far more science including physics than you have, so don’t pull that shit on me.

                  The amount of space you would need for the ships to gain enough speed to break into each other because there is enough air for them to move freely would be pretty damn big. Maybe if family size bags were the size of a large shopping cart your hypothesis might hold water, but chip bags just aren’t big enough for that to be a problem.

                  • Quatity_Control
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    It’s not the size of the space that enables the chips to move at speed. So no, I don’t believe you have studied any science. Watching sci fi movies doesn’t count.

                    Here’s a practical example for you to try. Make sure you get your parent’s permission!

                    Take a sandwich bag and put ten corn chips in it. Remove as much air as you can and seal it. Now, shake vigorously. You’ll find that the chips are held almost motionless by the plastic and thus do not break.

                    Now add a little air to the bag. The chips can now move. As you shake the bag back and forth, they collide, rotate in the allowed space, reposition inside the bag. You’ll get a few broken chips.

                    Now add heaps of air to the bag. When you shake vigorously, the chips all move in different directions, pin wheeling, bouncing off the bag surface, rebounding into each other, rotating inside the bag to present their crisp faces to the hardend edges of other fast moving chips. You’ll notice that it’s not the moving of the bag that damages the chips. It’s the sharp and abrupt change in inertia. The extra air allows the chips more space to orient in dangerous ways before the change in inertia smashes all the chips together at one end of the bag.

                    Now that you’ve done the fun practical part of the lesson today, I’ll follow it up with a simple thought experiment. What brands do you think have more broken chips in them?