• @PhlubbaDubba
    link
    -5
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Take your bets now everyone, we’ve got:

    • “stupidly tries to deepen ties with the cyberpunk oligarchy of China”,

    • “stupidly try to deepen ties with the impotent Mafia state in Russia”,

    • “stupidly try to deepen ties with petro-dictatorships/monarchies in MENA”,

    • “immediately double back because they realized that reducing reliance on the US means having to actually uphold their NATO spending requirements at a minimum to replace the US subsidizing their national defenses”,

    and least likely of all,

    • “actually do anything even remotely productive towards genuinely achieving strategic autonomy as a democratic superpower in the world independent of the US’ trajectory.”
    • @zephyreks@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      118 months ago

      How can China be an oligarchy if the CCP holds all the power? Billionaires ain’t got shit in China, even fucking Jack Ma was forced to step in line.

      • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        -18 months ago

        And who do you think the CCP is?

        oligarchy ŏl′ĭ-gär″kē, ō′lĭ- noun Government by a few, especially by a small faction of persons or families.

      • @PhlubbaDubba
        link
        -48 months ago

        Tell me you don’t know the definition of oligarchy without telling me you don’t know the definition of oligarchy.

          • @PhlubbaDubba
            link
            18 months ago

            Surveillance state headed up by an unelected elite of autocrats who’s only check and or balance is the scheming any one might be undertaking at a given moment.

            • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              88 months ago

              So a definition that China doesn’t meet.

              I’m also curious where you got this academic definition from, because it seems to have a lot of very vague parts.