• woodgen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    A database is centralized, can be shut down and is not public.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      But you’re buying and selling in game items in the scenario the previous user described. So it’s already centralized.

      Like, say you’re using this to trade Diablo loot. If Blizzard shuts down the servers, it doesn’t matter if you still have a decentralized system where all your loot ownership is recorded, because there are no servers to use it on. So what have you gained?

      • Shard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sounds like crypto once again a solution looking for a problem

      • woodgen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The whole point is that the certification of ownership will even surpass the death of the game. It still work in 3rd part apps and still can be traded.

        It’s simillar to a banned magic card. You can’t use it in tournament play, but you can sell it on the secondary market.

        Also someone can implement and host an alternative game client to the item ownership data.

        Obviously you should only play decentralized open source games to prevent the scenario of shutdown.

      • woodgen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You mean like things the YouTube API, where the centralized owner can decide to not show downvote data anymore?