I’ve had a certain debate a few times where you might say we argue over the “semantics” of the meat industry.

I am what you would call a vegetarian. While vegetarians won’t eat things that caused harm to produce, a vegan won’t eat anything having to do with an animal. A lot of those who would fall under the latter category hate us because they say anything that remotely resembles someone enjoying an animal product is supporting the meat industry which then kills animals, which means merely eating an animal product makes someone a murderer.

Meanwhile, there’s this concept many call piracy. It’s the idea that, as the meme proverbially puts it, “you can download a car”. The idea here, which I say in the way I do because there’s still an ongoing debate about it, is that it affects nobody. But then there’s the whole industry thing I mentioned. People on the other side of the debate often say “well what about the industry”. I’m not sure where on the scale in this topic you might put me, but I feel like there’s a glaring contradiction here. When it comes to animals, people think of the industry, but otherwise that’s not a factor.

My question is… why?

    • Call me Lenny/LeniOP
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Answers like this suggest the downvoters only prove how many people dismiss the question. I think in the very least it’s clear this isn’t simply about “loving industries”.

      • @ulkesh@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        No it was a sarcastic attempt to point out the nonsense of comparing two completely disparate things. I suppose it failed. Enjoy the nonsense!

        • Call me Lenny/LeniOP
          link
          English
          28 months ago

          Maybe 90% disparate things, but the question is about the one thing they have in common, that 10% of things which they successfully have in common, because that’s what I was wondering about.