HardlightCereal@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoLemmy.world removes its rules against discriminationlemmy.worldimagemessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up193arrow-down188
arrow-up15arrow-down1imageLemmy.world removes its rules against discriminationlemmy.worldHardlightCereal@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squaresimplelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up67arrow-down7·edit-21 year agoI’m pretty sure the ToS only exists for legal reasons, don’t make a big deal out of this. It doesn’t mean the admins won’t ban people for discrimination. Nothing suggests their stance has changed.
minus-squareHEISENBERG@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up61arrow-down5·1 year agoIt’s always the same trolls. Who would read the ToS and say “ok guess racism is back on the table”.
minus-squaresimplelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down10·11 months agoNothing was changed, it’s a new document.
minus-squareBolexForSoup@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-211 months agoThey had a TOS with discrimination listed. They now have one without it. Surely you agree that’s a “change”?
minus-squareBolexForSoup@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down20·edit-211 months agoIf it’s not a big deal then it shouldn’t be too hard to mention you can’t discriminate against someone’s religion/race/gender/etc. These things are a big enough deal they need to be removed but suddenly “it’s not a big deal” when people want them back.
minus-squaresimplelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down5·11 months agoA) They weren’t removed, this is a new document B) As other comments mention, discrimination and harassment is covered in section 5 C) Consider messaging the admins about it rather than push the alert button and causing needless drama
minus-squareBolexForSoup@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down22·edit-211 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareclueless_stoner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down5·edit-210 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squaremosiacmangolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 months agoSo section 5 covers all the same areas of harassment as the previous code of conduct? These are all bannable still on lemmy.world?
minus-squareBolexForSoup@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoI’m guessing we won’t ever hear a response.
minus-squareintensely_humanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoIf you were writing the document, would your reason for including it be merely that it’s a common practice?
minus-squareintensely_humanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down11·11 months agoHow would a user of an internet forum exhibit discrimination?
I’m pretty sure the ToS only exists for legal reasons, don’t make a big deal out of this. It doesn’t mean the admins won’t ban people for discrimination. Nothing suggests their stance has changed.
It’s always the same trolls. Who would read the ToS and say “ok guess racism is back on the table”.
Then why the change?
Nothing was changed, it’s a new document.
That is a change
deleted by creator
They had a TOS with discrimination listed. They now have one without it. Surely you agree that’s a “change”?
deleted by creator
If it’s not a big deal then it shouldn’t be too hard to mention you can’t discriminate against someone’s religion/race/gender/etc.
These things are a big enough deal they need to be removed but suddenly “it’s not a big deal” when people want them back.
A) They weren’t removed, this is a new document
B) As other comments mention, discrimination and harassment is covered in section 5
C) Consider messaging the admins about it rather than push the alert button and causing needless drama
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
So section 5 covers all the same areas of harassment as the previous code of conduct? These are all bannable still on lemmy.world?
I’m guessing we won’t ever hear a response.
deleted by creator
If you were writing the document, would your reason for including it be merely that it’s a common practice?
deleted by creator
How would a user of an internet forum exhibit discrimination?
deleted by creator