So far my list includes Comcast, EA, and Nestle. Tell me yours, and I’ll help out.

  • Kena
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    Name a single boycott that ever managed to take down an international corporation that didn’t end up making them more famous then they where before that. Being “boycotted” is even a marketing tool companies like nike have used before.

    Did you think this through or did you just want to be contrarian for no actual reason?

    • Mesophar
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think what you’re getting at is that the publicity generated by flashy boycott activism only generates free advertising for the companies. Which it certainly can! But that’s also dependent on what is being boycotted and the social and political beliefs behind it. If one group boycotts a product because the company is homophobic, another group buys more of that product because they agree with the company. That sort of thing.

      But it isn’t as two dimensional as “boycotting has the opposite effect”. Here are some examples of effective boycotting. Though you did get me interested in how effective boycotting really is, but I couldn’t find any efficacy studies that weren’t behind a paywall…

      • Kena
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Wow, thank you for the actually measured response. I’ll have a look at the link you posted!

    • Shambling Shapes@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The goal isn’t “taking down” a company. It’s to influence their behavior/policies.

      ChikFilA stopped donating to anti-gay charities when they were boycotted.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        ChikFilA stopped donating to anti-gay charities when they were boycotted.

        I feel like now they’re going to say because rightwingers attempted to boycott after that change, that boycotts don’t work…

        Because they don’t understand rightwing extremists are bad at boycotting and statistically insignificant to a nationwide chain.