In an interview for 60 Minutes, CBS News chief medical correspondent Dr. Jon LaPook posed that question to Linsey Marr, a Virginia Tech University professor specializing in aerosol science.

“They are very helpful in reducing the chances that the person will get COVID because it’s reducing the amount of virus that you would inhale from the air around you,” Marr said about masks.

No mask is 100% effective. An N95, for example, is named as such because it is at least 95 percent efficient at blocking airborne particles when used properly. But even if a mask has an 80% efficiency, Marr said, it still offers meaningful protection.

“That greatly reduces the chance that I’m going to become infected,” Marr said.

Marr said research shows that high-quality masks can block particles that are the same size as those carrying the coronavirus. Masks work, Marr explained, as a filter, not as a sieve. Virus particles must weave around the layers of fibers, and as they do so, they may crash into those fibers and become trapped.

Marr likened it to running through a forest of trees. Walk slowly, and the surrounding is easy to navigate. But being forced through a forest at a high speed increases the likelihood of running into a tree.

“Masks, even cloth masks, do something,” she said.

Not that I expect most people to believe it at this point…

  • SirToxicAvenger
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    maybe the video is more informative than the article, but the article has no new science information in it.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      If anything its even spreading a very slight misinformation. The blown plastic material of n95 and similar masks doesn’t operate in the way the article describes, they work on the principle of static electricity grabbing the particles as they pass through. If a mask loses its static charge, say, through washing, it loses a significant amount of its effectiveness.

      I’m not sure why it suggests that particles smash into the fibers (some do, but its the static electricity doing the heavy lifting.

      • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Articles are written at a 6th grade level. What you’re describing requires a higher level of understanding.