Because the difference between anarchists and communists is one of strategy
Wut? Anarchism and communism are diametrically opposed ways to organize the structural hierarchy of a revolution… If that can be reduced to “strategy” then in your definition there isn’t a meaningful difference between communism, anarchy, or fascism.
you’re not following your ethics to the ultimate conclusion and still have a strain of “I deserve the exploits of others suffering” in you, then you’re not actually a leftist.
We are talking about the organization of a political hierarchy and the distribution of labour and resources of humans, not the ethics of eating other animals.
Leftism does not have an inherent opinion of the morality of meat eating, environmentalism, or any other progressive cause people like to attribute to it. Leftism in its most basic form is simply when workers seize the means of production, and some of those workers have and will be in the meat industry.
You can build a leftist revolution around the morality of enviromentalism, or animal welfare, but in no way is it inherent to leftist ideology. To attempt to claim so would require a Prager U amount of historical revisionism.
Wut? Anarchism and communism are diametrically opposed ways to organize the structural hierarchy of a revolution… If that can be reduced to “strategy” then in your definition there isn’t a meaningful difference between communism, anarchy, or fascism.
We are talking about the organization of a political hierarchy and the distribution of labour and resources of humans, not the ethics of eating other animals.
Leftism does not have an inherent opinion of the morality of meat eating, environmentalism, or any other progressive cause people like to attribute to it. Leftism in its most basic form is simply when workers seize the means of production, and some of those workers have and will be in the meat industry.
You can build a leftist revolution around the morality of enviromentalism, or animal welfare, but in no way is it inherent to leftist ideology. To attempt to claim so would require a Prager U amount of historical revisionism.