Germany's power producers are preparing for their first winter without nuclear power, after the country closed its last remaining reactors in early 2023 amid ongoing efforts to modernize its energy system.
The facts are basicly everything that happend in the past, as that can be measured. Everything about the future is just a comment from the author. It is not a study or a model, but just a comment from some reporter at Reuters.
So if you actually care for the facts, it is that since Germany stopped its nuclear power plants Germany is producing less fossil fuel electricity. That graph comes straight from the Reuters piece. The question is if it continues that way and that is still open.
And the Reuters article says it most likely won’t and will be substituted with fossil fuel! And by going by that argumentation, I’m surprised you’re not suggesting climate change is just speculation since it’s all based on models and predictions
Wtf difference does that make?! Do you think the facts and sources are nullified since it’s labeled a commentary?
The facts are basicly everything that happend in the past, as that can be measured. Everything about the future is just a comment from the author. It is not a study or a model, but just a comment from some reporter at Reuters.
So if you actually care for the facts, it is that since Germany stopped its nuclear power plants Germany is producing less fossil fuel electricity. That graph comes straight from the Reuters piece. The question is if it continues that way and that is still open.
And the Reuters article says it most likely won’t and will be substituted with fossil fuel! And by going by that argumentation, I’m surprised you’re not suggesting climate change is just speculation since it’s all based on models and predictions
Again, can you read?
And what difference does that make if it’s a comment, article or whatever the fuck you call it? Damn you’re dense…
The difference is that it is the opinion of the author. An article would be repeating facts, which this does, but it also tries to put them into a context by giving his opinion on the matter. If you care to look him up, you will find that he has the job of covering the energy transition for a bit over a year and his background is in trading agricultural commodities and he has a business degree.
If you look at some other articles for example you have this: https://financialpost.com/pmn/business-pmn/germany-to-use-lowest-amount-of-energy-on-record-this-year
Please not this is not an opioion piece, with commentary or something similar at the top and it is quoting more scientific sources.
Again, how does that make this piece a “hypothetical cirkle-jerk” when it’s clearly supported by sourced data?