When I look at Grafana here: https://grafana.com/legal/privacy-policy/
it says:
No uniform technology standard for recognizing and implementing DNT signals has been finalized. As such, we do not currently respond to DNT browser signals or any other mechanism that automatically communicates your choice not to be tracked online.
and we not only know that this is some utter bullshit but also speaks volumes about the CEO and makes me wonder if they read what the courts just told scumbag LinkedIn?
People talk about DNT and GDPR Article 21 a lot. The basic working theory is that DNT doesn’t provide enough controls to be used as an objection basis at least in specific use cases and therefore is not covered by Article 21. If the German court ruled otherwise, I’m curious how that would be actually applied. A user over at StackExchange had a really good posting about this: https://law.stackexchange.com/a/90004 DNT is just so vague that it will be interesting to see what issues arise from this ruling.