• ThrowawayOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Yeah, its not the reason I would give. Theres a standard for gun control, in 'common use."

    And standard capacity mags (here theyre called high capacity) are in common use.

    I forget the supreme court case that established it but I bet I could find it if asked.

    But then again, the capacity of the mag has not been shown to correlate with gun deaths. Its valid reasoning, factually speaking.

    • NeuromancerM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I would use miller as the caselaw. Does a high capacity magazine serve a military purpose? Yes it does.

      • ThrowawayOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I?

        I think your comment got messed up.