Whats the point of writing prn, f@ck, sht or anything like that instead of the actual words? You can still read them, its not like they are gone if you replace a letter or two.
Whats the point of writing prn, f@ck, sht or anything like that instead of the actual words? You can still read them, its not like they are gone if you replace a letter or two.
What about n-word? You’re thinking about that word right now. Makes no difference wether I use the actual word or not.
That’s a bit different though. We don’t (generally) use “n-word” in place of the slur the way someone might type f!#k or say “frick” in place of “fuck.” We use it to talk about the term. So when someone is censoring themselves with replacement it can feel pointless, since the sentiment is the same: we both know what word you want to use to express yourself, just use it. When you use a censored alternative to a slur, you’re not just swapping one thing in for another leaving your meaning unchanged. You’re communicating an intention to avoid what you know to be a symbol of hate in a context that has no hateful intent.
Well, words like “fuck” or “shit” don’t indicate harm and aren’t supposed to offend people, so I think people should censor slurs but not swear words. Like, I’m autistic and feel kinda bad whenever I see the r-word being thrown around (I assume that some people have similar experiences with racial slurs), but I don’t get the same feeling if someone says “fuck”.
People have lost their jobs for using the actual world when describing what someone else has said. Context doesn’t matter. It’s like Voldemort. You simply just aren’t allowed to say it alout. Ever.
Retard is a good example actually. For some reason that is forbidden also but imbecile, idiot and moron are fine despite having been used for the exact same purpose historically.
Ni!
O, what dark times… When passing ruffians can say “Ni!” …at will, to old ladies.