• NeuromancerM
    22·
    10 months ago

    The government document list it as a partial meltdown. That’s the official term being used.

    I didn’t use an ad hominem. You seem to struggle with words. I used the term the government used and try to use it as an attack towards me. You now can’t stay on topic and can’t focus on the touch.

    Do you disagree that three Mile was a success?

    • karobeccary@lemmy.world
      32·
      10 months ago

      Yes, the government DOES list it as a meltdown, thank you. Honestly it can be so difficult to get through to you sometimes.

      Speaking of words and grasping their meaning, when you childishly accused me of ‘circlejerking in the corner’ just a moment ago, in an obvious and unnecessary attack on my character, aka an ad hominem, you actually used that phrase incorrectly as well!

      Allow me to explain - a circle jerk is when a minimum of two men jerk one another off, creating a “circle” of “Jerking”.

      When you lost your temper and began throwing meaningless insults in a manner very inappropriate for this forum, the term you would use more correctly would have simply been “Jerking it”, as you were accusing me of masturbating ON MY OWN in the corner.

      Please work on both your manners and your grasp of the English language if you are going to continue to insist on asking for my attention.

      edit:typo

      • NeuromancerM
        12·
        10 months ago

        Partial meltdown. It’s in the cite I supplied.

        I haven’t lost my temper. I’m just baffled by your behavior.

        I’ll ask for at least the third time.

        Do you see three Mile island as a success of the safety of our nuclear power ?

        • karobeccary@lemmy.world
          32·
          10 months ago

          So if you didn’t lose your temper, were you genuinely asking me direct inappropriate questions of a sexual nature?

          I mean losing your temper is one thing, but this is beginning to look like you are making unwarranted sexual comments to a stranger.

          Please do not do that, I am not interested and I do not consent to you talking about me in a sexual manner. I will consider any further talk in this manner sexual harrasment.

          • Lookin4GoodArgs
            22·
            10 months ago

            Warning: Rule 3

            Pre-emptively characterizing future responses as sexual harassment is textbook bad faith.

            Also, you both should’ve stopped a long time ago. Or, if you insisted on continuing, should’ve clarified the terms of discussion, which clearly revolved around what “meltdown” meant.

            • karobeccary@lemmy.world
              31·
              10 months ago

              Sounds like youre once again doin a stellar job of moderating there buddy, keep up the amazing work. This is why everyone respects you so highly <3

          • NeuromancerM
            22·
            10 months ago

            You’re acting in bad faith and trolling again. You refuse to stay on topic and want to circle jerking some imaginary victory instead of having a discussion.

            You refuse to answer the question and instead what troll. Have a good day.

            • karobeccary@lemmy.world
              32·
              10 months ago

              I asked you to kindly stop with the ad hominems, and if they are not ad hominems, to kindly refrain from making allusions about any sexual acts I may or may not be a part in.

              I hope you learn to either control your temper or respect the boundaries of strangers.

              All this because you dont want to admit to yourself that a partial meltdown is a meltdown. I hope you can learn and grow from this exchange.