• quicksand
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think it’s funny they’re being intentionally obtuse in answering questions and then describe people’s speculation as “disgusting”

    • baconisaveg@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why is it funny? If the union/lawyers/contracts are involved, there’s plenty of reasons not to blab to the press. This doesn’t seem like a “but the public has a right to know!” issue, so not sure why finding gossip disgusting would be funny.

      • quicksand
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Because they’re being intentionally vague in their responses. What else would you expect from people when you don’t answer their questions?

        • Lhianna@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          It does involve one other person though and that person has a right to their privacy.

        • baconisaveg@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          What else would you expect from people when you don’t answer their questions?

          “We fired Bob.”

          “Why?”

          “You’ll need to wait until we’re ready to release more information.”

          “That’s understandable. It doesn’t really concern me anyways, I was just being nosy.”