In a 261-page ruling, the three-judge panel struck down a requirement that gun owners disclose their social media accounts for review when applying for a concealed carry permit. Yeah, no. The government doesn’t need to be in your social media. Imagine if they required that for voting? The court also blocked restrictions on carrying firearms on private property that is accessible to the public, That should be up to the private property owner. as well as a restriction on concealed carry in houses of worship. That should be up to the church.

I get the Democrats hate freedom, but many of these should be decided by the property owner. If you don’t want firearms on your property, so be it, but that is your choice and not the government’s.

However, controversial parts of the law remain intact, including a requirement that applicants demonstrate good moral character and disclose household and family members on a permit application

Define good moral character. I would like to understand the second part better. If that is to block felons or other people, I am fine with it.

I am also for punishing politicians who create blatantly unconstitutional laws. It is amazing how often laws like this are passed even though they are obviously unconstitutional.

I carry almost every time I leave the house as I cross into a blue area where it’s unsafe. Until Democrats want to get back to law and order, I will make sure I am appropriately protected against the crime.