State guards are used by many states. Since the national guard can be federalized, states need a force to protect the states while the guard is gone.
Most people don’t even know about the state defense forces
State guards are used by many states. Since the national guard can be federalized, states need a force to protect the states while the guard is gone.
Most people don’t even know about the state defense forces
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂jesus h christ you people are the most easily manipulated bunch of cucks ever.
You cant even read your own “article” 😂😂😂🤣🤣😂😂
Warning for violation of rule #1
Honestly, your arguments can probably stand on their own without calling people names.
FairPoint
I read the article. What do you think was incorrect?
First of all, Washington Times is a known radical right propaganda outlet, and openly presents itself as such. Second, it is not claiming that liberalism is a mental illness; it is highlighting that liberals are more likely to trust science and seek therapy than radicalized superstitious religiotarded nitwits. Third, the “conditions” it presents are themselves radical right wing propaganda (such as the police violence statements).
I never said liberalism is a mental illness. I said liberals are more likely to be mentally ill. The two are correlated.
Nice try to disparage the source. It is a peer reviewed study they are talking about
The only correlation between the two is that liberals are likely to believe in facts and understand cause and effect.
No as the study shows they are more likely to be mentally ill. They are no more likely to believe facts. Also they don’t get cause and effect. It’s something they can’t grasp.
https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/psychologist-explains-why-economists-and-liberals-get-human-nature-wrong
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/liberals-and-conservatives-are-both-susceptible-to-fake-news-but-for-different-reasons/
Okay I can see that you’re just another one of those guys who’s going to stand there with his face against the wall yelling “no you!”.
The difference between me and you is that I gave you a very specific list of all the things conservatives have built their entire life around and have been utterly and completely dead wrong about (and aggressively belligerent over, which makes it a mental illness) while you just seek out confirmation bias from radical fascist and neo conservative blog posts.
No. No more. I acknowledge that stupid liberals exist, but theirs is an ideology that attempts to do good while conservative ideology is hell-bent on metaphorically crushing orphans in an orphan-crushing machine, and whose representatives consistently and repeatedly do their best to cause the most harm.possible to the most people. If you deny this then you admit you are one of them, and are a sworn enmy of the American people.
In the meantime. i want all my tax money back that your shithole states stole from us.
And one more question: when have book banners ever been the good guys? As a side note, did you enjoy crushing Dicie Chicks CDs in 2002, and di you ever apologize to them when you turned out to he dead wrong yet again about a war?
No you gave a word vomit of list of things that amounted to gibberish I have you cited information. Facts vs feelings.
Good to know you think banning child porn is bad. That’s the only book I know of that Florida banned.
And how do you think Oregon has wronged you in taxes ?
I gave you an actual factual list. Facts don’t care about your feelings.
If you only know of one band book and you actually think that it’s child porn, you have utterly failed this debate. You lose. I win. End of discussion.