• JokeDeity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    When terrorists destroyed two of the largest buildings in America and killed far more people than Hamas did in their attack, we didn’t see fit to eradicate every single human being in the middle East. Why is complete genocide acceptable to you guys? Why is this much civilian death justifiable to you?

    • Compactor9679
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      Should have, that way we avoid future terrorist attacks

      • JokeDeity
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Don’t you have a Trump rally you’re late for?

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        I said it 22 years ago when the towers fell, and it looks like it’s time to say it again. You don’t get rid of angry people by killing angry people.

        • Compactor9679
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Dont think the war was about getting rid of angry people, it was about getting who was responsable and killing them.

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Oh, sorry! I didn’t realize it was just one small country that was supplying the world’s terrorists. Carry on, I suppose.

      • crapwittyname
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Please tell me you don’t actually mean this unironically?

        • Taokan@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          So, the problem is if you kill a few angry people, they all have at least 2 friends/family members, and therefore you create twice as many angry people as you destroy. The only way killing angry people actually reduces the number of angry people is in fact genocide. But if you’re willing to commit genocide, you have to stop and ask yourself if maybe, you’re the angry person.

          • crapwittyname
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah, it’s almost as if killing people isn’t the best way to achieve anything.

        • Compactor9679
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Define civilian death… When all the “civilians” are terrorist well… Not many civilians left…

          • crapwittyname
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Ok, so you unironically want to destroy every single, what, Arab? Including, presumably, children, because they’re all “terrorist”.
            Do you realise what an awful piece of shit that makes you?