ratman150@sh.itjust.works to Firefox@lemmy.ml · 5 months agoHow about no?sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square143fedilinkarrow-up11.42Karrow-down119file-text
arrow-up11.4Karrow-down1imageHow about no?sh.itjust.worksratman150@sh.itjust.works to Firefox@lemmy.ml · 5 months agomessage-square143fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarekratoz29linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up89·edit-25 months agoThat disclaimer announcement just screams lazy IT, or general management by your side.
minus-squareAeonFelis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31·5 months agoMy bet is that FF has some privacy and/or adblocking features that this company doesn’t like.
minus-squareBransons404@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·edit-25 months agoThere are a few features that FF doesn’t have that chrome does, but it mostly involves video streaming. Adblocking is likely the reason though. Source: am front end dev
That disclaimer announcement just screams lazy IT, or general management by your side.
My bet is that FF has some privacy and/or adblocking features that this company doesn’t like.
There are a few features that FF doesn’t have that chrome does, but it mostly involves video streaming. Adblocking is likely the reason though.
Source: am front end dev