• dan1101
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    176
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    We have two big problems here, one that this person would make the phone calls, but you will never 100% fix human nature.

    The biggest problem is that police will send a SWAT team after nothing but an anonymous phone call.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is the part that gets me. It keeps happening and they think that it’s just fine.

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        5 months ago

        They just love any excuse to pull out the toys.

        When I was in high school I thought I was going to be a cop. Mostly because I was an unoriginal idiot and a friend wanted to be a cop. Went so far as to go through the explorers program where you hang out with cops and they show you stuff. You go on ride alongs. Spend a lot of time with cops.

        As it happens about half the guys teaching this program were swat.

        They were drooling for any excuse to suit up and kick down doors.

        This was 20 years ago, at the time they’d tell you that 90% of officers never use their firearm on duty.

        It colors their perception of any situation. Affects their decision making.

        Could this be a prank? Maybe. But could I put on the armor and kick in a door? I mean they did call in a threat…

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yeah. I took a communications course from a former cop/hostage negotiator. It was actually pretty informative. There is a national program to teach police how to be effective and empathetic communicators trained to defuse high stakes situations.

          They just don’t teach it to most cops.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I overall agree with your points but I will say that the type of person who probably excels at a life-or-death job like swat is someone who lives for that adrenaline rush in the first place. The problem is in their over-activation, like an overly-active immune system.

          I watched the Uvalde PBS Frontline documentary and what stood out to me is that all those cops were glorified ticket cops one-step removed from mall cops. The only two guys showcased to seem to know what they were doing and had a willingness to do so were the border patrol’s equivalent to swat, BORTAC, who seemed professional and were the ones who entered the room first and ultimately eliminated the shooter.

        • Thrashy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          One of the more unnerving “benign” interactions I’ve had with a cop was when the officer standing guard duty at the DMV subjected my wife and I to ten minutes of exposition about his various weapons and the effects they had on people while we waited for the line to move us out of conversation range. It’s never been more clear to me that somebody desperately wants an excuse to do violence, to anybody he might be allowed to.

          • dan1101
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            That guy almost needs to be reported as a danger. He knows all the weepon effects and has put himself in a position where he may be able to legally find out.

    • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean the main reason they do that is they have to take it seriously. If they decided to ignore anonymous tips, then how many actual situations would they fail to prevent and handle.

      Swatting is just taking advantage of the fact that they have no choice but to take it seriously.

      That being said, if it’s a place that gets swatted regularly or a place that’s likely to be swatted due to various reasons they should have precautions in place with people they can trust in order to double check before acting, or at least be prepared to go in with their guns still holstered.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The problem isn’t that the police respond, it’s how they respond. The fact that the police themselves are so dangerous to the presumptive victim on whose behalf they’re responding – as tacitly acknowledged by “swatting” being treated as a serious crime going beyond mere misuse of police resources – is the much bigger problem here. Frankly, going after swatters is at least 50% a misdirection tactic: an attempt to shift the blame away from the reckless police.

      • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 months ago

        Patrick Tomlinson was swatted over 40 times in 2023 alone. It took WAY too many times before the police would simply knock on his door and ask him if everything was okay. You’d think after the 4th or 5th time they might figure it out.

        https://www.wisn.com/article/milwaukee-science-fiction-writer-victim-of-swatting/40912738

        https://www.insideedition.com/milwaukee-sci-fi-author-patrick-tomlinson-victim-of-yearslong-swatting-campaign-of-terror-82365

        • LarmyOfLone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          You’d think Patrick would have set up a big sign like “Hello, if you’re swat, chill! It’s just a prank bro! Just come in and have a beer.” But no, so the guy basically resisted /s

          • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            The frustrating thing was that the police had him on a list. They KNEW the history. But half the time they still rolled up ready for war. It was a banner day when he was woken up at 3 in the morning only by two normal officers knocking on the door to let him know it happened again.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh shut up with these intellectually dishonest arguments. You know there’s a problem you know the police are overly aggressive to civilians but hey that’s fine I guess and swat to every situation, come on.

          This is about American police being way over militaryized. Swatting is not a problem in many other nations so it’s a solvable issue but if we’re just going to say it’s acceptable then nothing will ever change.

        • GBU_28
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          Huh? You.just want em to send Joe bob over for a chit chat? He’ll unwind this whole bomb thingie-whatever

            • GBU_28
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Carry that thought. Then what?

              Bomber blows up the neighborhood and Joe bob did fuck all.

              To be clear, I’m not making light of swatting, and not accepting the culture of modern cops to go all tactical to every little thing. Injustices are happening, people are getting hurt.

              I personally want to live in a country where a bomb threat is treated with maximum seriousness.

              • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Are you suggesting that unarmed negotiators don’t have an amazing success rate?

                They are public servants who volunteer to do a dangerous job. Considering the way they treat innocent people now, yeah I’d much rather hire competent people who are willing to do the job properly.

                • GBU_28
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I’d love to see a source on that. I’ve never heard negotiators are particularly effective.

                  “Amazing success rate” sounds like a 75% + de-escalation rate with the offender in custody and the bomb undetonated.

                  • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    Nope. I don’t have numbers. But I have seen competent, compassionate people talk desperate people out of some dire situations without harm to anyone. We should always start there. Every single time.

                    Cops on the other hand must be leashed.

              • Grimy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Crazy to see you get down voted for this.

                Not taking the threat seriously is exactly how Uvalde started.

                • GBU_28
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  “popular” sentiment is FULLY ACAB, dearm, negotiate, community activist.

                  Life is not black and white. Sometimes a strong response is needed. I’m real fucking thankful police exist. Despite their massive failings.

                  On the other hand there are many many many calls that don’t need an armed response, and a community negotiator is a better choice.

                  Ultimately policing in north America needs massive restructuring. Unnecessary violence and injustice are happening everyday, especially to minorities.

                  But the response to bomb threats is NOT the top of the list of changes.

            • GBU_28
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Huh? The military isn’t deployed domestically.

              Do you mean the national guard? They don’t train on residential bomb threats do they?

              I want the most local, most able team to respond ASAP, to resolve the threat. Properly trained police are that group.

              Acknowledged that many police are not properly trained.

      • dan1101
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Until they figure out what is happening, if anything at all, the SWAT teams certainly stand the chance to do more harm than good. How about some recon first? Deaths are happening, and if nothing else innocent and completely bewildered people wind up with police guns pointed at their heads. Most of the time it’s cleared up but the victims are left with “Oh sorry folks, someone called and said there was a hostage here.”

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t know what they could do with a mosque. I think it is a very valid assumption that someone could be in there with a gun and a very valid assumption it could be an asshole “pranking”.

        Be nice to see some harsh criminal penalties for people who SWAT and maybe some more advanced tech like cameras in the building they can plug into and see.

    • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think the third big problem is that the police will send a swat team after just an anonymous phone call.

    • ovalofsand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d also like to add that putting this kids face in the news is going to inspire copycats

    • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Do they actually send a SWAT team? I just assumed that was the term but they actually just trigger a high priority multi officer response based on what they say.

        • GBU_28
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          A swat team is a specially trained unit.

          An uparmored tactical larp response.from.many officers is not that.

        • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          5 months ago

          Your comment doesn’t really answer my question. Do they actually send a SWAT team?

          I don’t really care about how they are armed. Is it called swatting because a SWAT team is deployed, or is it because that happened once or sometimes but it’s not always the case?

          • nutsack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            your baby gets flash banged in the face and someone tries to make this useless point

            • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              4 months ago

              What point? I’m honestly trying to find out if it’s only considered swatting if an actual SWAT team is deployed or if that’s become the generic term.

              There’s a term for this, called genericide. Like how Kleenex is used for all facial tissues or Qtips is used for all cotton swabs.

              If all you want to do is find reasons to get offended and be combatant take your bullshit somewhere else.

              I’m so sick of people like you on Lenny eroding actual conversation so you can mud sling and interpret everything in the worst possible light.

              Sometimes a question is just a fucking question jackass!

              Blocked for being the waste of space you are.

              • nutsack@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                okay to answer your question it doesn’t matter if it’s swat or not

                Swatting is a criminal harassment act of deceiving an emergency service into sending a police or emergency service response team to another person’s address. [wikipedia]

      • dan1101
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Search for Swatting incidents and see how many people have been terrorized or killed on the basis of nothing but an anonymous phone call.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you make the stakes high enough in the 911 call, absolutely. You don’t want cops to waste time checking things out if a real hostage situation is playing out of whatever.