• No_
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    You didn’t say it, but when someone else did you became extremely pedantic, “corrected them” to maintain your perceived moral high ground, and straight up invented a strawman to not have to discuss it.

    So you basically did say it.

      • No_
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Your entire comment is about correcting OP. None of it addresses the headline. That’s a strawman.

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          but the publications are grossly misleading

          I think you’re only referencing the headline, the article itself clearly states what you said

          This one? Where I say the publication is not misleading, only the headline? You don’t understand what a strawman is.

          Your comment history indicates you’re pervasively angry about little things like this. What’s up with that?

          • No_
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            When you think looking at someone’s comment history is valid as an argument lmao. Just add ad hominem to the list. Or are you going to climb on a second high horse and say I don’t know what that is either? You’re a clown.