• NeuromancerOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m not opposed to all restrictions. I’m opposed to restrictions that make it hard for me to carry concealed for self defense. Bump stock are not something I’d use for self defense or fighting a government. As such I don’t care if it’s banned. That’s what the 2nd amendment is about. A bump stock isn’t an arm. It’s an accessory

      • NeuromancerOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        Be civil.

        The 2nd amendment isn’t being argued. A bump stock is not an arm. Have you read anything on the case? What is being argued is if it creates a machine gun. It does not.

          • NeuromancerOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            4 months ago

            How? Do you think Scalia didn’t know what he was talking about ?

              • NeuromancerOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                14
                ·
                4 months ago

                He is dead. So you think his zombie corpse has a vested interest in restricting our rights?

                  • NeuromancerOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    I’m not opposed to every restriction. I’m just opposed to most restrictions. The bump stock isn’t even about the 2nd. It’s about can the atf change the meanings of words. While I don’t mind the ban. The logic is bad and that’s why the ban should be overturned. It does not create a machine gun. It does not meet the requirements of the law.