ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoTwinsiesi.postimg.ccimagemessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up11.07Karrow-down1107
arrow-up1965arrow-down1imageTwinsiesi.postimg.ccZeroCool@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square108fedilink
minus-squareintensely_humanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down21·4 months agoThe left: wealth is a zero sum game The right: 🤦♂️no, it’s not
minus-squareblazeknave@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·4 months agoSorry I don’t understand. Which policies of the right support what you’re suggesting?
minus-squareZeroCool@slrpnk.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·4 months agoThe imaginary ones.
minus-squaremcmoor@bookwormstory.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·4 months agoTrickle down economics is based on philosophy that wealth is positive sum
minus-squareintensely_humanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down6·4 months agoMy comment is about philosophy, not policy. The idea that rich people are rich because poor people are poor is a leftist idea. It assumes wealth is a finite thing, which must be taken away from one party to accumulate with another.
minus-squareblazeknave@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 months agoWealth is finite. By definition. There is a scarcity of resources in the world. A few people have most of it. You’ve been on earth before right?
The left: wealth is a zero sum game
The right: 🤦♂️no, it’s not
Sorry I don’t understand. Which policies of the right support what you’re suggesting?
The imaginary ones.
Trickle down economics is based on philosophy that wealth is positive sum
My comment is about philosophy, not policy.
The idea that rich people are rich because poor people are poor is a leftist idea. It assumes wealth is a finite thing, which must be taken away from one party to accumulate with another.
Wealth is finite. By definition. There is a scarcity of resources in the world. A few people have most of it. You’ve been on earth before right?