International mediators have been working for weeks to broker a deal to pause the fighting before the Muslim holy month of Ramadan begins around March 10. A deal would likely allow aid to reach hundreds of thousands of desperate Palestinians in northern Gaza who aid officials worry are under threat of famine.

The Israelis “have more or less accepted” the proposal, which includes the six-week cease-fire as well as the release by Hamas of hostages considered vulnerable, which includes the sick, the wounded, the elderly and women, said the official.

“Right now, the ball is in the court of Hamas and we are continuing to push this as hard as we possibly can,” the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity under ground rules set by the White House to brief reporters.

  • catloaf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Does it say that Israel will stop oppressing Palestine? No? Then I don’t think Hamas will agree.

    • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hamas was previously asking for a ceasefire in exchange for the release of all the hostages they held, for what that’s worth. Surely this deal is asking for, at worst for them, that.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        4 months ago

        They were asking for a permanent ceasefire though, right? This one seems pretty temporary.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        No. This is a temporary ceasefire. Hamas has repeatedly refused they won’t accept one after the fucking mess that was the last one.

    • anlumo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hamas’ goal is not to stop the oppression of Palestine, but the elimination of Israel. These topics are related, but not the same.

      • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        How are they not the same? Israel is by definition oppressive to Palestine, as it is a colonizer state created by pure legal fiction by the west after WW2. This is doxumented, there are documents about the founding of Israel as “give them part of Palestine, of course the locals won’t be happy but we’ve been colonizing for 4 centuries we know how to do this”