Why did this change? Was it a greed thing?

  • DreamySweet@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    For longer videos, a lot of people will stop watching before the video ends. A lot of bandwidth is wasted by buffering the entire video when the user is only going to watch 50% of it. To save bandwidth, sites like YouTube only buffer a tiny bit at a time.

      • DreamySweet@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        I meant something like opening a two hour long podcast and only listening to 30-60 minutes before closing the tab or switching to a different video. With the old functionality and current internet speeds, it likely would have buffered the entire video in only a few minutes. It could have wasted multiple GB of bandwidth.

      • Comment105
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll open dozens of 15-45min videos, watch a few to completion, close the rest after watching a tiny bit or nothing at all.

          • Comment105
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            you’re not gonna believe this

            so I used to make a new set in the bookmarks folder, then I pull all the current tabs into the new set, then I never watched it ever again
            there are probably ~400 links in that YouTube Sets folder

            • Yoga@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Tf thats kind of autistic I used to have a similar problem but I try to keep the list down to like 10-20 cuz be honest if you were truly interested in all 400 of those videos you’d be watching them anyways.