https://archive.ph/aR1MT

Bdelycleon triumphs.

“While I appreciate the author’s work to create a more equal justice system, this policy needs to be part of budget discussions,” Newsom said in his veto message. “With our state facing continuing economic risk and revenue uncertainty, it is important to remain disciplined when considering bills with significant fiscal implications, such as this measure”

The Judicial Council has estimated that the expanded program would cost the state between $4 million and $9 million a year. The veto means the San Francisco program will end this year.

  • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    it’s in the court system’s best interest

    Why? Court best interest is to get plea deals, and long wait times and accompanying lawyer’s fee is the shit to fuck poor people

    • cosecantphi [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because if potential jurors were to stop seeing the court as legitimate in sufficient numbers, they’d be much more willing to use jury nullification against obviously horrific laws. Defendants in such cases would never receive guilty verdicts and therefore lawyers would advise to never take a plea deal in such an easy to sympathize with case.

    • Grandpa_garbagio [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Just hooting from the balconies here but, in agreement with cosecantohi, it’s the random selection bias not being neutered yet lies a strength within the jury