Rep. Eli Crane, R-Ariz. referred to Black people as "colored people" Thursday in floor debate over his proposed amendment to an annual defense policy bill, prompting a stern rebuke from the former chair of the Congressional Black Caucus. Lawmakers were debating a series of GOP-backed amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act, which the House aims to pass by the end of the week.
deleted by creator
And yet those semantics are trivial to change and have real effects on people. It costs you nothing to call people what they’d like to be called.
I cannot believe how resistant people can be to putting in a modicum of effort to not be racist/sexist/queerphobic. It does not take much effort to use the preferred term.
It’s insane. It takes absolutely no effort to do. Most of the time it just comes across as “I want to still be able to be racist and you’re not allowed to be offended”.
It’s not even like “colored people” has been acceptable to use in the last 20 years. At least not in most places.
Oh, I can absolutely believe it. They simply do not care, at the end of the day. Some people’s desire to feel smug or superior outweighs whatever little empathy they might have about the well-being and happiness of others that they don’t even care about anyway.
And those semantics are very important to people and ridiculously easy to do right, so why do it wrong on purpose unless you are deliberately an asshole?
Semantics matter!!!
Semantics are about the meaning of words, and how the meaning can be changed drastically by minor changes of a sentence or the sequence of words that have similar meaning? Semantics are important, even if the above poster believe they aren’t.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantics
That’s exactly the case here? The words have similar meaning, but the sentences do not, both because of the cultural origin, and the sequence of the words actually matter.
Edit: I was originally a bit confused, because the above post uses the word semantics contrary to the meaning. I guess that can be expected for people who just in general don’t get it.
It’s clearly saying they don’t care about the difference, not just saying it’s a semantic difference.
It’s a reply in bad faith and a very transparent one at that
Thanks ;).
I have noticed the word tends to seemingly be used in that way, and have corrected my post to describe that semantics actually matter.
You could try reading a comment before replying to it next time. Assuming you replied to the right comment, which might not be the case.