• CoderKat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love BG3. It’s a very different game from Skyrim though. After all, that city is basically a third of the game. Plus BG3 has all kinds of travel and camera limitations that Skyrim doesn’t. That’s what lets them make the city truly seem like a sprawling city.

    By comparison, Skyrim basically lets you go everywhere and it has a far larger map. Skyrim chose the “big as an ocean, shallow as a puddle” approach when it comes to map design. Though NPCs are actually deeper than BG3. Skyrim NPCs have lifes, while BG3 is frozen in a moment.

    • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know Skyrim wasn’t that shallow. It’s not like most of its locations are window dressing like in an assassin’s creed game. Almost the entire map had somewhat meaningful encounters and mini story arcs

      • Sigh_Bafanada@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah you’re right. I do think that in comparison to BG3 it’s very shallow, but in a vacuum or in comparison to many other games it’s actually quite deep

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There were many spots in Skyrim that were so pretty that I found myself just stopping and staring like I’d do in real life at scenic spots.

      • Noir
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The first time you enter the Ratway and you encounter that weirdly beautiful scene of the woodcutter’s axe stuck in the stump?

        ✋😔👌