As Twitter, renamed X, faces increased scrutiny in the EU and usage falls, Elon Musk has floated drastic action.

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not so sure.

    He owns it outright now.

    There are no other shareholders to answer to.

    If he wanted to close it down tomorrow, he could just turn off the servers and sack everyone.

    • orcrist
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is likely that some of his employees have contracts, and he might have to pay out the remainder of those contracts, depending on the details and national labor law.

      • hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I also think as he doesn’t align politically with a lot of ppl on Twitter, he might wanna phase it out slowly, so there’s no sudden jump in other platforms trying to take over the role of Twitter.

        Ofc I have no evidence for that, but I could see him doing that.

      • WarmSoda
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How’d that go with all the other employees he sacked that had contracts? What’s the difference?

        • orcrist
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most of the employees that were in the US did not have contracts, so most of them could be let go at any given time. However, I recall that when he tried to fire a bunch of workers in Ireland, they just lawyered up, and their lawyers solved the issue.

          In places where contracts are standard practice for employment, it’s a fairly common that when a company wants you out, they pay you a large amount of money or the remainder of the contract to leave and not return.