• D3FNC [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Israel just openly doing a war crime 100% speedrun just daring anyone to say anything that hasn’t been filtered through an entire PR department

    The level of arrogance on display in not realizing how devastating the consequences of this open genocide will be makes Americans look meek and humble by comparison.

    • Unaware7013@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was going to speak up against the murder of civilians in an open air prison by an apartheid state, but I didn’t want to be labeled an antisemite.

      • most of the world
      • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Simple, we change the definition of antisemite from “discrimination against all jew” to “strong criticism against far right Israel government who commit war crime for decades”.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Antisemitism is a idea, ideas can live in the minds of people, people reporting from Palestine are antisemitic, therefore killing the journalist was a valid military target.

    Even though the journalist, an Arab, is a Semite…

    Semite - Wiktionary 2. A member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia and East Africa such as the Akkadians, Assyrians, Arameans, Phoenicians, Canaanites, Hebrews, Arabs, Aksumites, and Ethiopians.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s also not get carried away with fervor. People are dying. Being against Israel’s overreaction, genocide, and colonialism is not being antisemitic.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed, but neither should we ignore the large contingent of actual bigots who will use these atrocities to advance their respective ignorant and hate-based agendas. There is real anti-semitism and islamophobia pervading the international conversations.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Indeed, but the corporate media and governments seem to be taking Israel’s side, so I feel the more accurate balancing point is to focus on the humanity of Palestinians. They are truly powerless being toyed with by Israel while Hamas ensures that the generalized punishment from Israel (a war crime) will continue.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah, nice to see wiktionary hasn’t been edited.

      Articles on Wikipedia are heavily edited so that anti-semitism can only mean anti-Jew in Wikipedia. Terms such as Semitic people are called obsolete.

      Wikipedia really gets politicized.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Articles on Wikipedia are heavily edited so that anti-semitism can only mean anti-Jew in Wikipedia.

        When was the last time that term meant anything but anti-Jew in English? Yeah I’m aware what the word Semite means. Sometimes word meanings change. Pretty sure anti-semite has referred to people who hate Jews since many decades ago.

        Is there a reason you’re so salty about this particular fairly old shift in language? Do tell why.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is there a reason you’re so salty about this particular fairly old shift in language? Do tell why.

          In a pre-WWII European context (where the only relevant Semites were Jews), letting the meaning shift was one thing.

          In this Middle Eastern context (with two relevant groups of Semites), it’s entirely different: it’s an attempt to “other” and dehumanize Arabs by denying their shared Semitic heritage and instead claiming it exclusively for Jews. It’s a fundamentally dishonest definition that facilitates DARVO tactics.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            it’s an attempt to “other” and dehumanize Arabs

            So using a term the way it’s been used for decades is suddenly malicious if we change contexts.

            No, I’m not buying that at all.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I mean, if you generalize it THAT far, I’m sure there are many terms that become malicious. The current bad words weren’t always bad words in some cases (thinking more like the odd slurs like “idiot” than the tried and true cuss words).

              In fact, wasn’t f*ggot ONLY a term for bundles of sticks used for tinder until it became fashionable to burn gay people like witches?

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Redefining words has been a political tool since forever. But they do have meanings, and a history, so if someone uses an archaic term… you can use the term right back at them.

  • Epicurus0319@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I both laughed and cried at the same time. What is it with both belligerents in this war and killing the other side’s journalists? (One of the most dishonorable and dirty things you could do)