• Dharma Curious
    link
    fedilink
    226 months ago

    Does anyone know if this is something that was actually possible? Like, how sure are we they looked one way and not the other?

    • @GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      446 months ago

      “Every reconstruction involves some level of inference and speculation to literally ‘flesh out’ details not preserved in the fossil record,” Celeskey explains. “In the process of creating paleoart, artists and the researchers have discussions about how to fill in these missing pieces, which helps everyone involved to think about how they are interpreting the actual evidence at hand.” From a NatGeo article I found

        • @casmael
          link
          196 months ago

          “I asked around the office and everyone agreed that giving the t-Rex wings looked dope”

          • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            96 months ago

            Similarly, “I asked around the office and everyone agreed that giving dinos the feathers we now know they had would look too silly”

          • pancakes
            link
            fedilink
            English
            36 months ago

            “Triceratops had cat ears because of reasons.”

    • @HenryWong327@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      316 months ago

      Nope, sauropods were already right up against the limit of what’s physically possible for a land animal on Earth. If they were that chonky they would have been too heavy and would have overheated just from their body heat.

    • @Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      126 months ago

      Not very likely due to the weight. Same with the trunk suggestion, there was a lot of air space and gaps in the few skulls that were preserved to make them weight less.

    • ancap shark
      link
      fedilink
      126 months ago

      Of course it’s possible. It’s highly improbable due to weight, of course, but it’s not impossible.

      There’s a lot of information that was not recorded in fossil, and we have very few fossil recorded, compared to how many animals of a species lived. How we reconstruct existinct animals keeps on changing with every new information, so it’s always cool to challenge the way we view a creature.

    • @Masimatutu
      link
      56 months ago

      Do you think a penguin of that size could get anywhere? The process of reconstruction is a very complex one, but basically they look for clues in the remains and speculate what is evolutionarily most likely.

  • 🔍🦘🛎
    link
    fedilink
    English
    86 months ago

    Reminds me of an XKCD strip about spiders. A time traveler comes to the present to see a live spider since they only had remains to look at. They’re astounded that spiders can make webs.

    This honestly reframed dinosaurs for me forever. Science is extremely conservative with its interpretation, but the reality is that we only know very basic details. Millions of years is a long time to develop some really strange physiology.