I think the current application of rules is very fucked up in that they judge a player by the outcome, not their intent, nor even a “reasonably foreseeable consequence” of their action.
Havertz was a red card all day long for me, it’s an incredibly dangerous, out of control tackle, off the ground, plenty of force, that’s going to break someone’s leg but he gets lucky and doesn’t make much contact, so they give a yellow, even though it’s blatantly dangerous. Rashford tries to shield the ball and a leg appears under him and it’s a red. It’s not some outrageously dangerous action, if he doesn’t make contact, and it’s not even a foul, whereas the Havertz one should be a red regardless of contact, IMO.
We now punish dangerous tackles and unfortunate accidents identically. It was a red card in 2023, but it shouldn’t be, IMO.
Disclaimer: I don’t have a hard on for punishing Havertz in particular, it was just the most recent “dangerous tackle” let off that stuck in my head
I think the current application of rules is very fucked up in that they judge a player by the outcome, not their intent, nor even a “reasonably foreseeable consequence” of their action.
Havertz was a red card all day long for me, it’s an incredibly dangerous, out of control tackle, off the ground, plenty of force, that’s going to break someone’s leg but he gets lucky and doesn’t make much contact, so they give a yellow, even though it’s blatantly dangerous. Rashford tries to shield the ball and a leg appears under him and it’s a red. It’s not some outrageously dangerous action, if he doesn’t make contact, and it’s not even a foul, whereas the Havertz one should be a red regardless of contact, IMO.
We now punish dangerous tackles and unfortunate accidents identically. It was a red card in 2023, but it shouldn’t be, IMO.
Disclaimer: I don’t have a hard on for punishing Havertz in particular, it was just the most recent “dangerous tackle” let off that stuck in my head