Not really talking about the current job situation, but do you ever notice how there are no postings for really obscure positions that definitely exist but are never posted anywhere? I feel like David Graeber would have a lot to say

  • Yurt_Owl [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    8 months ago

    Many job positions are never made public and are either advertised internally to the company or even worse don’t exist until some rich connected fucker asks for one to place their failspawn into.

  • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    A lot of jobs are locked away behind networking unfortunately. Every so often I’d see stuff that I’d be genuinely excited for (e.g. working on differential equation solvers at a nuclear power plant), but yeah usually the fun stuff like that which definitely exists just never makes it to public postings. I have a few engineering friends who will tell me the opportunity of being just the differential equations guy on an engineering team exists, and I believe them but I’d really appreciate if they let me know when their company is hiring. Right now it’s more “oh yeah I know this boomer physics guy who is living your dream”

      • Magician [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        8 months ago

        It wouldn’t be so annoying if people didn’t cling so hard to the meritocracy delusion. I remember being told as a kid that if I worked hard, it would pay off.

        What I wasn’t told was that my work would have to be seen by someone in a position of power.

    • Magician [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      8 months ago

      I didn’t even think about that. If jobs are scarce in a capitalist system, they’d be hoarded and commodified too.

      Why hire a random person when you can hire a relative or a buddy and get something in exchange? It would be leaving benefits on the table just to give the job to a qualified person who doesn’t owe you anything.

      • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Typically those jobs go to qualified and competent people as well. It’s not a “fair” distribution system by any means, but it mostly works out because, tbqh, work generally isn’t so prohibatively difficult to require rigorous hiring processes.

        • Magician [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          8 months ago

          I didn’t mean that the connected person who was hired is less qualified. I just meant that given self-interest in a capitalist society, people in charge of hiring would prioritize giving jobs to people they know or personally benefit from.

          I mean that’s just intrinsic bias, but it just sucks how pervasive it is on top of racism, sexism, classism, ableism, etc.

          That on top of all those things keeping someone from fulfilling work, a hiring manager might hire their buddy or someone from a fraternity or one of their relatives.

          And good point about the nature of work qualifications. Most jobs don’t require intensive skill, education, or training that can’t be taught on the job. I mean people wouldn’t be able to get away with lying on their resumes otherwise.

        • StellarTabi [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          Typically those jobs go to qualified and competent people as well.

          if you mean the vibes based method of measuring qualified and competent, then yeah that happens.

        • Hohsia [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          Sounds kinda like affirmative action but for your social circle

          Extreme example, but I believe that’s maybe what @Magician@hexbear.net was getting at? Like you could have all of the qualifications, but you’re passed up by default because of who you are

      • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        In aviation new pilots are hired almost exclusively via networking (unless you want to work menial, underpaid and dangerous jobs). It literally is a commodity, specifically jet flight time.

        I just found out a few days ago from colleagues that there is apparently a company that will let you pay them for your labor just for those sweet sweet hours.

    • Hohsia [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      Damn they’re not even locked behind a paywall?

      deeper-sadness

      Also, shit. I think this is why I was encouraged to join a frat during undergrad

  • Nagarjuna [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    8 months ago

    They’re being shared on a need to know basis between managers and the employees they like. It’s a big club and you ain’t in it.

    • GarfieldYaoi [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I can’t help but think that this is just a tantrum for all the anti-discrimination laws.

      You’re not going to let white people abuse some type of racial nepotism system? Fine, well I will make ALL my hires nepotism hires since technically that’s not discrimination. Oh, what a coincidence I don’t happen to have any brown friends. Oh well, guess they’ll have to starve.

      • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I think it’s just easier. Looking properly for the most meritous person for the job is a whole process when they know a guy that can do the job well enough and that takes minutes and they get to be the big man in their friend group

        it results in racism and classism being perpetuated but it’s clearly largely laziness

        • invo_rt [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, I’d second this. Anecdotally, I work in a small/medium business and I’ve heard “does somebody know anybody who can _____” many, many times over the years. In the viewpoint of management, it’s much easier, cheaper, and less risky to hire someone on referral than go through the entire application song and dance.

        • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’ve done a lot of interviewing as a relatively low level engineer and its an expensive process in general for a company. Per each candidate you’re looking at a few hours per engineer, times how many people are on the interview. It ends up costing the company a few thousand just to talk to a candidate over the course of the processes.

          If you’re a company looking for 5 good employees, you’re going to spend a lot of money interviewing all the people that don’t make the cut, grabbing someone internally or by reference is far cheaper. It’s sorta a gamble when moving on with an interviewee. You basically need to make a low information gamble based on a cheaper short screening, to see if its worth the time for a full interview.

          I don’t really support no-interview hires unless they previously worked in that position, left, and came back though.

  • roux [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I had a fucking interview for a IT support specialist position at one of the school districts here and the next day was told I didn’t get the job. Suddenly right after that the IT support assistant role opened up. They clearly both hired the assistant for the specialist position and also wasted my goddamn time.

    3 weeks ago I had an interview for another IT position that I felt like I nailed. They said I would know by that Friday. I still haven’t heard anything. Supposedly they had a few people reschedule. They wanna consider the people who can’t stick to a pre-decided time…

    Have an interview in limbo currently while we try to figure out if I can work for the direct competitor of my last employer even though the job is completely different.

    Had an interview yesterday that I think went ok but not great. $18-22 an hour and no 401k matching. Asked me if I could start right now and told them sure. And my stupid fucking ass is gonna take it if they offer it to me. It’s literally half of what my last job paid.

    I’m 40 years old and have been fucking doing this charade for the last 20 years because I can’t hold a job because I’m neurodivergent and that doesn’t matter to the corporate overlords.

    Just fucking fuck man…

    • charlie [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 months ago

      The place I work at is desperate to hire. The last 3 new hires have been through connections the manager has, all family or friends of family, and none of them have worked out very well. We’re constantly fixing their mistakes, but they fill a contract slot and make money for the company. They don’t pay enough to attract people with the right skillset, so here we are. They say nobody is applying, and they refuse to think that’s related to pay.

      Several of the most productive workers for the company have left for better offers. Interestingly, the family and friend hires are the only ones that stick around despite competing offers floating by every so often.

  • StellarTabi [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    8 months ago

    one anxiety I have, is that I’ve not formally looked for a job for so long, all my knowledge for job seeking might be dangerously outdated. post-covid, post-AI, post-me-too, post-Trump, next gen surveillance, etc. I have no idea what kind of plot-holes I would be about to fall into.

    • Hohsia [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      8 months ago

      I see the job search process as a consistent cycle

      -Spend hours looking for a job

      -Eventually make some progress with a position that is interested in you

      -Become very hopeful that you might get an offer

      -You learn it pays 30/hr max full time where the rent average is 1200/month and any negotiations are shot down hard

      I know a lot of people would be very pleased with that pay, but Godamn I took at multiple loans and was told my major would get me a job that would “pay that back in no time.”

      The job market kinda feels like an industry in and of itself agony-consuming

      • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        it’s a numbers game you just make loads of applications until you get one

        you absolutely shouldn’t get emotionally invested in a job until they give you an offer. I would encourage you to forget you even applied until you hear back from them

        you are 100% going about it wrong getting hopeful or invested before the concrete offer is not the way to go. There is a good chance with each application that no one even reads it because they get so many

        you need to apply to many jobs. Having a good CV that highlights transferable skills is key. It’s a process where high volume of applications is the most important thing

        • Hohsia [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Hmm “transferable skills”

          Was grilled in my head that technical skills/programming languages are the most important by far, so I guess I didn’t think to highlight soft skills. Maybe that could be a problem?

    • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      it’s a numbers game you just make loads of applications until you get one

      you absolutely shouldn’t get emotionally invested in a job until they give you an offer.

      It’s a bit like online dating

        • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          this is true. It can be hard to find jobs to apply for. You mentioned you have friends who work in industry asking them to let you know if there’s a posting would be good.

          A website where job openings are posted would be ideal. Really there should be a government department where every company has to register job openings, that would massively streamline the process as a central repository of all jobs would cut down on the search

    • SkeletorJesus [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t know what it was like before, but I can’t help but think it’s different than what it used to be. I’m a recent grad in computer science and I’ve been job hunting for a few months now. My resume isn’t stellar, sure, but it’s not abysmal either. I stopped bothering to keep track of how many resumes I’ve sent once I passed ~300ish two or so months ago. All to entry level positions, but otherwise across all sorts of things. I’ve tried remote and in-person across the country, lowered my salary expectations $10k/yr under the bottom quartile of starting salaries in my field, made it clear I’m willing to relocate, and had friends at a few different companies try to get me an in. I’ve yet to hear back from anywhere.

      Gotta think that one of the big downsides of everything being remote in CS is that now everybody everywhere can apply for every job. If I find a posting on LinkedIn with less than 400 applicants on the first day, I consider it unusual. Seems logical that if 100x more people are applying for each post, you’d have to apply to 100x more places. Some very nice people on here offered to throw me in their referral system, but I chickened out last second. That probably wasn’t the smartest move, honestly.

      Anyways, didn’t mean to turn a reply into a personal vent session, but yeah, I can’t imagine that it’s always been like this. It’s completely maddening. The very reason I went into CS instead of fucking physics or philosophy was specifically because nobody shut the fuck up about how much demand there is for coders and I was too naive to really understand that when you hear that, it’s usually more about collapsing wages than filling positions.

    • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Actually now you can often easy apply on some of these sites, they’ll ask you like 2 questions and take your resume

        • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          Oh it’s been algorithms for a while

          Here if you want to really beat the algo, and it’s a job you really want

          Put a cover letter as the first page of your resume. Make a 2 column table with the job requirements on left side, and your experience for each topic on the right. Skip meaningless job requirements just do the meaningful ones. Now you probably have all their keywords in your fucking resume, and when a human reads it they can see you fill all their requirements.

          That means even if you don’t have experience, say, operating trains, it still says the words “OPERATING TRAINS” inside your resume next to your response “well, I drive a tram ok” so you’ll get selected by the stupid word search robot

          • Hohsia [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Your resume will eventually be viewed by a human though, right? Isn’t that a bit of a barrier to gaming the bot?

            • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              No not a barrier at all. It’s baller shit. Instead of having to process how your description of your past experience abstractly relates to their needs, you’re directly saying every requirement is met. I would do this even if robots didn’t exist.

              Can shift quickly to handle unexpected tasks | I managed 5 accounts simultaneously and delegated and scheduled work from hundreds of emergency work requests

              Preferred: Able to diagnose and repair Caterpillar or other heavy equipment failures | I have 4 years of experience with Komatsu machines and would be able to quickly translate those skills

              Now your resume says CATERPILLAR and you can bet the hiring manager or recruiter put that word in as a keyword. You’ll be bumped up based on that, and you are not only being honest, you’re spelling things out and making it super simple for the person who has to scan 40 resumes

              They might even put in really stupid keywords like “unexpected tasks” which you will only match if you are copying their description

  • GarfieldYaoi [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 months ago

    smuglord: “No one owes you anything, kiddo. Just hire yourself and start your own business.”

    (No really, make a BS ‘business’ and put it on your resume. Have a youtube channel? You’re an editor-in-chief. Freelance? You’re CEO.)

    • invo_rt [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Second this. Also, get a friend who can take a referral call and can vouch for you as your manager. I’ve applied to literally thousands of jobs and the only job I’ve ever applied to that actually followed up on my contacts was a job with a state university because they have a rigid structure for their hiring process.

    • bigboopballs [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      (No really, make a BS ‘business’ and put it on your resume. Have a youtube channel? You’re an editor-in-chief. Freelance? You’re CEO.)

      I gotta try this, but I am too lazy to even run a YouTube channel

      • Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Do you have to? Say you are employed by a YouTuber, doesn’t need to be a real guy or the guy doesn’t really need to have you hired. The fuckers don’t play fair, why should you?

    • Hohsia [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      You know, I could probably do a lil test. The local republican group meets weekly and I could go as serious worker trying to build connections and grow my network (I think I just threw up in my mouth a little bit)

  • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    look up reserve army of labor

    actually the bosses stopped creating jobs because we weren’t grateful enough. the west has fallen. billions must apply.

  • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Capitalism requires huge numbers of unemployment so that they can use the precarity of work as a tool to threaten against collective action. Lot easier to lay everyone tryna unionise off and hire fresh hands when work is hard to come by and folks are starving.

    And also… Uh… I may have eaten all the jobs. Sorry, but I was really hungry.