Hey, so I believe in a higher power but I’m not on board with any particular religion. Anyone else think it’s cool to just fly solo as a good human, no religion attached?

  • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    In my experience, at least in the US, non-denominational when associated with an institution generally means “Christian” but not affiliated with a sect. They’re (typically) still quite Christian, and the phrase can be and is applied to churches ranging from the ones flying Pride flags and declaring that they’re open to everyone to ones like Westboro - some of the most radical Christian churches are non-denominational because their views are too conservative for even the more conservative right wing religions.

    The phrase itself is an organizational status and does not indicate what kinds of beliefs a person has. It’s not unlike someone describing themselves as “politically independent.” You don’t know if they’re Greenpeace types, libertarians, or far right of the republicans.

    Edit: The usual term in the US for what I think you’re describing is “Spiritual, but not religious.” That’s the way it’s usually written in census and survey forms.

    • Call me Lenny/Leni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      If that’s what that is, what term would you use for someone whose conclusions are more unspecific than even can be categorized under the “Christian” umbrella?

      • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I realized my omission and put it in my edit. The term generally used is “spiritual but not religious.”

        It can include everything from atheistic humanism alongside the Gaia hypothesis to Wicca.

        I think this is a very fast growing segment of the US population now. It might have been in a recent Pew survey.