Totally normal question to ask, regular poll choices
“yes - only child prostitute”
For ethical reasons b
as opposed to a child prostitute who has siblings
Should move to Argentina, heard they’re abolishing the age of consent.
I’m really hoping this is just some very dark humor
Never bet against hell world.
I just wish I could do so and win once
They’re reducing the election of a free market extremist in Argentina into “haha libertarians are pedos” jokes.
Indeed, the people most likely to be welcoming to them are market radicals and if your worldview revolves around “everything must be allowed”, then legalizing that is likely to happen.
Reductio ad realitum
When I was in grad school, my advisor used to respond to any question that began “Imagine a possible world where…” by just stopping the questioner and saying *no, I’d rather not."
Imagine a world where you didn’t have to listen to these stupid questions
Imagine the american president is 100 years old and dying of dementia. His last wish is one more genocide. Is it ethical for the Zionist Entity to do one?
Yes, but only if the genocide is of only the bourgeoisie
if i ever hear someone say the phrase “free speech” again I’m dunking their head in the toilet
“Imagine a possible world where someone said it ironically”
i am taking said imaginary liberal to the bathroom with me
sneerclub had a moratorium on threads about her because she posts like this with fulltime dedication
The infinite potential of the human mind and these fools are trying so hard to find justifiable ways to engage in csa.
What if the world was made of chocolate pudding
What if the pudding consents though
It was already a really weird hypothetical, then it just got weirder. Why do they always have to make it weirder?
I suppose it’s just what happens when your brain is uncucked and can finally unleash its full power.
Or something.
Reality has a radical bias so you can’t really rely too heavily on it to argue for reactionary ideas. Instead they construct elaborate thought experiments and try to reason themselves into the position they want to arrive at from first principles. Being disingenuous jackasses that reasoning always ends up being deceptive and irrational.
Good point, a lot of the most hardcore “true believers” in this stuff are extremely good at rationalising their own shitty behaviour and making themselves feel like they’ve “figured it out” when all they really did was find a bunch of vaguely intelligent sounding excuses.
LSD and garden gnomes; not even once
Hypotheticals were a mistake.
:internet-delenda-est:
Suppose-
No.
A look into the mind of a libertarian.