Hi.

I have 4 linksys tri-band mesh nodes.

Am I better having:

A) fewer nodes connected (and a weaker signal between them, but less ‘daisy chaining’)

or

B) more nodes so that the signal strength to get to the end point remains strong throughout

Basically the end point e.g the node in my bedroom can either be connected to the main node which is some distance away, or I can have one in between (ethernet backhaul is not possible).

I can’t quite work out whether a weaker signal is better overall compared having a node in the middle and how much impact this has on latency etc.

Thanks

  • mcribgaming@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    10 months ago

    There is no set answer, because everyone’s environment is different. You’ll just need to test it for yourself and see.

    First, do speed tests with and without the secondary mesh node. Run a dozen in each configuration to get a usable sample size. Use different speed test sites too.

    Then do a continuous ping test to your Default Gateway (your router’s LAN address, for example 192.168.1.1 is common, but just check) with and without the secondary mesh node. Run that test for an hour each or more during busy network times, like in the evenings. Compare the results.

    Then see which you prefer.

    The placement of your mesh nodes, test computer, how busy your WiFi is in general, and layout of your home will determine test results. So there is no set answer.

    I will say that, with wireless backhaul, you should just use the least number of nodes you need for full coverage. Four seems excessive. Most homes need only two mesh units to cover everything, three for bigger or unusually shaped houses.