• KevonLooney
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I said the Senate doesn’t need to exist because:

    Unicameral legislatures are very common in the world today, and they work.

    Do you disagree with that? It’s true. No country ever moves from unicameral to bicameral because it’s simpler and easier.

    There’s already other veto powers: the President and the Supreme Court can both veto the Legislature. Why does the Legislature need a veto for it’s own decision? That’s just unnecessary.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m proposing replacing the president’s veto with the Senate’s

      That’s literally the main thing they’d have in this model, the veto.

      The reason they have it in addition to the courts is because the courts focus more on using it in cases where a law itself breaks established laws, while the Senate could use it for bills that are hypothetically legal but which still cross some other line like say disproportionately burdening indigenous communities or being unjustly against practices of organized labor.