Every year we see various fanbases complain about the ownership of their favorite NFL team and wishing they would do better/sell, ect. Many dislike their ownership for perceived incompententcies in running the organization (Mark Davis, David Tepper), others dislike their owner based on personal dislike (Dan Snyder before he sold). So my question for you: what makes a good NFL owner? Should they be highly involved in team decision making ala Jerry Jones? Be way hands off like Kroenke? Does their participation in the community matter as much as winning championships? Or do you just want success?

Edit: I guess I should say, this is an excellent opportunity for Packers shareholders to pat themselves on the back

  • 00azthrow00@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think patience is the number one, you want to see either progress or regression before making a decision. Let the coach make mistakes and see if he learns and corrects them. I feel they can set a direction for the team, but should leave personnel and coaching decisions to their football people.

    I like our owner, he’s a good person who wants to win a Super Bowl. It shows in how he spends money on the team. I feel like he has meddled in the past behind the scenes though.