• qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I need to get back to playing W3. It seems like a great game by all accounts. But, I will not be purchasing another game from CDPR until at least 6 months post-release given the state of CP2077. Not only was it released in an unacceptable state, it wasn’t the game that was promised. There have been so many good games released between last year and this year, I can wait until ~2030 if they need to take their time polishing it and making it a complete experience.

    • nous@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      7 months ago

      But, I will not be purchasing another AAA game from CDPR until at least 6 months post-release

      FTFY, unfinished release day games seems to be more than just a CDPR problem.

      • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s unfortunately true. There are not many developers/publishers I would trust to purchase their products on release day.

    • n1ckn4m3@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Not only that, but their PR person gaslighting people with the article claiming that the game wasn’t bad, it was just “cool to hate” has left a really bad taste in my mouth. The game could be absolutely amazing now and the expansion pack could be the game that we were always promised, but the experience and the follow-up has been so bad that I’m similarly waiting until post launch (heck, perhaps even until GOTY with included DLC) for any future CDPR games.

      • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I personally couldn’t make it past the “no object permanence” issue, where NPC’s would just spawn into and out of existence depending on where the camera was pointing. It was like a magician brought a clear cloth to the table to perform a trick, and we could see how the trick was performed the entire time. It doesn’t make his performance less impressive, but it sure would make it less immersive.

        • Æther@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I mean, nearly every 3d game doesn’t render what the player isn’t looking at. CP77 just did it poorly lol

          • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not rendering != despawn entities and respawn entirely new entities every time your camera changes direction. They also advertised it as NPC’s each having their own unique routines, etc. Talk about overpromising and underdelivering. This broke immersion too much for me to play the game. The second I hit the city and saw how NPC’s were handled, I was done. It’s unfortunate, because I thought the map design, sound, graphics, and gunplay all seemed really good.

    • Defaced@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      You realize cyberpunk wasn’t the only game they’ve made that needed fixed after release right? Both W1 and 2 had enhanced edition patches to fix the broken shit in both games. W1 was a 7/10 game on release by multiple outlets. W3 was the first game they actually took their time with and delayed multiple times to avoid the enhanced edition patches. Anyone who thought cyberpunk was going to be flawless on release was breathing in that hopium.

      • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You realize cyberpunk wasn’t the only game they’ve made that needed fixed after release right?

        Nope. I skipped those.

    • ono@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It seems like a great game by all accounts.

      Unpopular opinion: I liked the characters and lore a lot, but I found that the sloppy controls and sluggish movement made the world frustrating to interact with, and most of the encounters were so repetitive that I was bored before long. I ended up switching to easy mode so I could finish the story without having to spend much time on the tedious gameplay.

      IMHO, if you were to rush through W3 in story mode and skip the side quests, just to get the background before playing W4, I don’t think you’d be missing much.

      • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I have only played a few hours, but I recall what I thought was a side quest involving pigs, which was a great quest. Are you suggesting that memorable side quests are infrequent and can/should be skipped?

        • ono@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I actually found the side quests’ writing pretty good, and indeed, sometimes even memorable. Unfortunately, most of those quests share a handful of nearly identical tasks, so the good writing started to feel like little more than window dressing before long.

          The map encounters were worse, though: Lots of question marks telling me exactly where to go meant there was nearly no real exploration to be had in this open world, and arriving at them led to the same copypasta events over and over again. If you happen to enjoy those events enough that you can’t get enough of them, then that’s great, but I was bored after the first dozen or so. (Skyrim was far better in this department.)

          I remember liking a lot of the main quests, and the characters, and the story, and the world building. It’s just that the bulk of the gameplay felt like filler content, with forgettable combat and awkward controls. (I swear, Geralt, if you plod forward one more time when I pull back on the stick, or let one more candle get in the way when I try to interact with something useful, I’m gonna smack you.)

          I hope Witcher 4 maintains (or even improves upon) the writing quality of its predecessor, and adds responsive controls and interesting gameplay beyond the main plot points.

  • Computerchairgeneral@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    On the one hand I’m always excited for more Witcher. On the other hand Cyberpunk 2077. More seriously, I hope they make a great game and it that lives up to the expectations people are going to have for a new Witcher game, but I’m keeping my expectations in check until I see the finished product.

    • TheDubz87@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m hoping the initial backlash from cyberpunk actually registered with them. Other than that I’m also worried about what kind of story and characters they’ll use considering the way the last dlc for witcher 3 ended. Not sure I’ll be into Ciri based gameplay. That was my least favorite part of Witcher 3, and I don’t really want them to retcon the end of blood and wine either to continue with Geralt.

      • Tripp1976@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        They need to go back in time to when all the witcher schools were still going and you can choose which school you’re a part of at the beginning, make your own witcher instead of one playable character.

        • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          That sounds really bad on paper, tbh. The cool parts about the player character all stem from how it’s a defined person with an existing personality and place in the world. If it becomes Skyrim: Witcher Edition, we’d probably also inherit the shallow~inexistent storytelling of that.

          • Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            What if it becomes Baldurs Gate 3: Witcher Edition? BG3 also has a player created character without an existing personality and the storytelling is certainly not shallow in that game.

            • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Yeah but one of the biggest pitfalls is seeing another company catch lightning in a bottle, then thinking that this can be freely recreated. Just that BG3 could do a user-created character with a good story does not at all imply that any other company can do it. Nevermind will. Or even that Larian can do it again.

          • Tripp1976@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            While I do kinda agree with you, I think CDPR is a lot better at writing interesting quests and characters than Bethesda. Still not as good as larien but I don’t think it would be todd Howard bad.

      • LeafOnTheWind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        I could see them doing interesting things with Ciri’s magic, but there is a good chance they use a different witcher. Or maybe significantly earlier than the existing witcher games? Young Geralt or maybe Vesimir?

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not sure I’ll be into Ciri based gameplay.

        I’d love that. Sure they’d have to really re-do her combat style since it was only a brief intermission before, but it feels natural to progress to her eventually. And honestly, it’s high time Geralt takes a bow after 3 games as big as they are, and as awesome as those were. Exit before they eventually ruin him. 😅

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Cyberpunk’s patching has showed me that ~1-1,5 years after release is a really good time to jump in.

      By which time, between patches and mods, the worst stuff is dealt with and the experience can be really nice, if a bit tepid due to bad design decisions that mods cannot fix. Still, enjoyable game after patches and at a discount.

    • And009@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Witcher already has the lore done well. They just need to get the experience right.

    • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Witcher 3 is probably my favourite game of all time, largely because of the semi-parental storyline with Geralt, Yennefer, and Ciri. That said, I think the weakness with the Witcher 1-3 series as a whole is that the plot is too complex. Since most modern AAA RPGs have many, many side quests, I think the main plot of a long RPG should be relatively simple or else risk diluting its dramatic effect.

      I feel like CD Projekt Red did a better job with that aspect of story-telling in Cyberpunk, even if the overall emotional arc is less intense than that of Witcher 3. There are lots of cool things to do and interesting side quests in Cyberpunk, but the main arc is pretty simple. You can go off on hours of side quests and still come back to the main plot without forgetting what’s going on.

    • haruki@programming.dev
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I learned the lesson: keep the hope low (so I don’t get disappointed), and never preorder.

    • TIMMAY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I believe I heard that some developers in CDPR were going on strike? Has anyone else heard about something like that?

  • rustyfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Good. I hope Witcher 4 will rock! Still not preordering anything. Especially not from CDPR after Cyberpunk.

    • Klystron@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Never pre ordering anything for any reason ever has been a pretty good piece of advice to live by, I’ve found.

    • Senseless@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Good. I pre-ordered the collector’s edition of Witcher 3 and it was worth every penny. After the Cyberpunk launch debacle they need to earn back that trust.

  • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    I hope it gets all the love and care The Witcher series and its fans deserve. They are going to have to make up a lot of ground with consumers to get back to W3 standards though.

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      I hope the praise heaped on Cyberpunk 2077 now doesn’t let them forget the absolute shitshow of a launch so that they don’t try to rush out the next game half-baked as well.

      • Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think the biggest problem for Cyberpunk was that they also released it on last gen consoles which cost them many resources that could’ve otherwise been used to polish the game for the other platforms.

        • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          They also flat out lied about what kind of game it is right until the release. They promised NPCs with their own lives and incredibly intricate dialogue choices that have ripple effects on the whole game. Nothing like that is in the game, even now.

  • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I guess I’m one of the few people who thought Witcher 3 was a bit bland. I was already getting very bored at Novigrad and at Kaer Morhen I totally lost interest and have been unable to pick the game up since.

    What do people like about it so much? I’ve read all the books, and generally speaking thought they were good, so I’m not exactly lacking in lore either.

    • teichflamme
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The world is interesting, Geralt is a cool character to play, combat is nice enough, and first and foremost every quest is worth looking into.

      The game has a ton of side quests that had more thought put into than the main quests of other games

    • brenticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Keep in mind that the main comparison point for it was Skyrim, which was pretty much the previous RPG people got sucked into.

      The story was pretty good and it had a good number of meaningful side quests. Gwent was also a lot of fun, and the Blood and Wine DLC was another step above to keep the hype alive for longer. The combat can get fairly involved without feeling overly complex. Rather than the blank slate of many games of the era, you play as Geralt, who actually has relationships in the world to draw you in.

      Basically, rather than the unfocused sandbox of random stuff in Skyrim, it was a more involved story-rich experience that a lot of people appreciated.

      That said, the hype was ridiculous. It’s a very good RPG, not the second coming of Christ. It didn’t really do anything new, it was just a solid experience.

      • ToxicWaste
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s a very good RPG, not the second coming of Christ.

        That just shows what people want. Just a solid game, playable from start to finish. Due to time constraints i never finished Witcher 3 and barely made it past the prologue of BG3. But both those games are highly celebrated.

        They don’t reinvent the wheel. They are just very solid games and come without predatory pricing.

    • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Storytelling/quests that surpassed anything its modern contemporaries had to offer. Add in a beautiful open world with alright combat and it’s a hit in my books. Time also wasn’t an issue back in those days as I were still in high school when it launched.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Movement and combat in every Witcher game is so unpleasant for me that I find them unplayable. I’ve literally gone through YouTube “Choose Your Own Adventure” style videos of the games because the stories are great but I hate how Getalt moves.

    • Epicmulch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The story telling is what really did it for me. I consider witcher 3 to be the greatest game I’ve ever played. The quality of that game is still extremely high even to today’s standards.

    • Aurix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Skellige Island and the two expansions were actually great. Blood & Wine had an amazing flow. Otherwise I agree. It was a rehash of The Witcher 1, but not as charming.

      Unpopular opinion: Many hyped up games fail immensely at some parts. But due to the social group effect criticism gets drowned out. Currently playing Elden Ring and while it makes a massively great impression all around it shows really bad game design cracks after more intense looking, especially in the boss and arena encounter design as if they were inexperienced. Cluttered, glitchy arenas impeding gameplay, just annoyingly specific roll tells, bad hitbox choices and the requirement to memorize full boss combo routes like a multiplayer fighter add to that 1-2 kill combos and it is terrible at times to me not we the effort. I am at Leyndell with almost all available side content/areas done. Waiting for the obligatory git gud chads storming in.

      • nous@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Many hyped up games fail immensely at some parts

        Well, yeah… that is so vague that it cannot help but be true. Almost all games fail in some way (especially more complex ones), they can all be improved by making some changes somewhere especially when everyone has different preferences for how things should work and what annoys them.

        And by definition almost any hyped up game is going to fall short of expectations. Hype is born by imagination and has no limits, but games are delivered in reality where compromises need to be made, especially when time pressure is involved. And by nature the more hype a game is the more likely it is going to be over-hyped and fall far shorter of the expectations.

        I am wary of any hyped up game. Hell, I would be wary of any AAA game on release day these days. Wait for real reviews to come in and not what the prerelease hype says about it. And even after remember that what games one person enjoys a lot another might absolutely hate.

        • Aurix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I would not say it is as broadly self defined and I tried to give specific reasons. Elden Ring itself at its very core is about the core difficulty and yet I had way too many deaths caused by jank (the difference on how much better my experience with the same bosses in a cleaner arena speaks volumes, or the terrible twin fights) , not just some side nitpicking on minor mechanics. And so many reviews giving it excellence and yet there is apparently quite a bunch of people rating it below many of their other titles as at the last part of the game the problems pile up to an even worse degree.

          I do enjoy it for most of the other aspects and I understand and agree what it is why people rave about it so much , but I would have loved to see scaled down boss damage, especially combos and twin fights to bridge the fun-defying issues, although a different design philosophy would be the better solution.

    • daemoz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I played the full game and the dlcs. Only the 2nd dlc and the baron stories are good. Id suggest people just play the blood and wine dlc, its really great. The game isn’t very fun, but I do love the atmosphere and city design. I was totally sick of looking at wet horse ass. Gwents more fun than monster hunting though sadly

      • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I really liked monster hunting as a potions guy. I felt like a real Witcher. I’d have to track them down, read up on them, then drink potions and apply oils that would be strong against them, then finally take them out. That preparation and build up made me as immersed as a Witcher as I felt as Batman in the Arkham games.

    • And009@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I liked the alchemy in Witcher 2 more but the game mechanics with 3 and the RPG elements were amazing for me. And on par with Skyrim imo. In some aspects I liked Witcher more like how it affected the world building based on your actions.

    • telllos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I remember going into the first sandbox, and then going forward with no xp very fast. Then it was just me being weak as hell and rolling around to dodge and using a cast to make a shield around me to avoid dying. Then I stopped. Load time were horrible. But I want to try the remaster on ps5.

    • ManosTheHandsOfFate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      For me it was too long. I finished it with all the DLC for the first time a few days ago. I generally enjoyed it but was also quite happy to be done with it when I finally finished it at around the 110 hour mark. I actually took a break after Hearts of Stone and played a couple of shorter games before I came back to finish off Blood and Wine.

      I haven’t yet played a single player game that I thought needed to be more than 60 hours no matter how engaging or well made it was.

  • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I still have to start the witcher 3. I’ve like 5 or 6 games on the go at the moment so it will be a while yet. I also plan to get cyberpunk goty or whatever edition for like 5 ducats in a future steam sale.

    • UndulyUnruly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      You, pal, are in for a treat. Block your calendar.

      I wish I could erase the memory of having played the game multiple times.

      I think it’s time for a New Game+.