• MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    True. Outright rent-seeking is certainly typically safer than flipping.

    I think the risks that crushed Zillow are still relevant: Trying to do something at national scale requires a situation where lack of local knowledge is unnecessary. And housing has proven a few times not to be that.

    I would bet on Amazon to come up with an “investment” scheme that externalizes the extreme local market risks to their “partners”.

    • Neuromancer
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just don’t like large corporations buying up the housing. It just drives the cost up. I am not against local landlords. I had rented many times when I didn’t want to buy and I appreciate clean, affordable, and well-maintained properties. Local landlords can only buy so many properties before they run out of cash, as such the market limits itself. Bezos can buy a lot of homes before he even puts a dent into his cash funds. There are times when corporate ownership makes sense, I had a friend who traveled to BFE for weeks a time and his company owned a house where he could stay. They always had someone out there for weeks or months at a time.

      • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Agreed on all points.

        Some communities pass laws to keep investor landlords out entirely.

        Amazon buying rental property might also be ruled illegal under current anti-trust laws.

        I don’t know the best approach, but I don’t expect good things to come from Amazon getting into the landlord business.

        • Neuromancer
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Amazon isn’t involved. This is another company.

          • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Good point, but really beside the point.

            Anyone who thinks Bezos’ controlling interests in both companies won’t cause public harm should consider my fine selection of bridges that I’m selling for ridiculous bargains.

            • Neuromancer
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              He will not cause harm because of Amazon, he will cause harm because he’s Bezos.