• Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    HAH!

    Dude you lost this argument the moment it started:

    The Establishment Clause is a limitation placed upon the United States Congress preventing it from passing legislation establishing an official religion, and by interpretation making it illegal for the government to promote theocracy or promote a specific religion with taxes.

    The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the government from preventing the free exercise of religion.

    While the Establishment Clause does prohibit Congress from preferring one religion over another, it does not prohibit the government’s involvement with religion to make accommodations for religious observances and practices in order to achieve the purposes of the Free Exercise Clause.

    Just stop man. You’re embarrassing yourself.

    • NeuromancerM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Who are you replying to as it has nothing to do with what I said?

        • ThrowawayOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Please do not name call. It’s part of rule 1. Consider this a warning.

          • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            For the record, where was their warning when they said the other person “looked silly?” or are we showing a bias?

            EDIT: Yeah. I thought as much.

        • NeuromancerM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think you are replying to the wrong person.