Subspace is the answer of course!

  • Jamie@jamie.moe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    They’re probably referring to quantum entanglement, which affects the entangled particles instantly.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah but you can’t interfere with quantum entangled particles, if you do you break the entanglement. So it isn’t usable as a method of communication.

      • intensely_human
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It isn’t usable as a method of communication by any means we’re aware of.

    • anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Something I’ve not been asked to get through my head about QE: If observing the entangled particle destroys the entanglement, doesn’t that mean we’d need “containers” of entangled particles to send a bunch of information?

      • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        You can’t send information with entangled particles. You just learn the state of the other particle by inference when you observe the first particle.