• flyingjake@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I wonder if an argument could be made that birthdate is a component of your genetic information including family medical history? It is also potentially age discrimination?

    • Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Technically this is discrimination based on age.

      They were born 4/20/(year). You could make an argument they are discriminating all people exactly (X) years, 4 months, and 2 days old.

      • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah we typically thing age discrimination is saying we only hire people between 20-40y/o but it would also cover it if you said “I won’t hire someone 21 years old only” and still applies to banning someone 21.5 years old. And 21 years and 6 months and 27 days old.

        Same applies if I ban anyone with an age divisible by 3. It’s a group of people, but if their age has anything to do with why you aren’t hiring them then I’d say this applies.

        • davidgro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          No, the comment was written on the 18th so 2 days. The 4 months only matches because this is December.

          • Darth_Mew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            wtf does the comment date have to do with April being the (4th) month and the (20th) being the 20th day of the month?

            • davidgro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Because how old someone is is relative to the current time. And that’s the wording that the commenter used: People who are x years, y months, and z days old. The next day those same people will be a day older.

              Say the discrimination was about people born on Dec 20 instead of April, in that case they (where I am) are currently X years, 11 months, and 30 days old, and tomorrow is their birthday.

              I just realized that they did calculate it the wrong direction though, the 4/20 peeps are 3 months and 30 or 29 days old today (not sure on that) today.

    • Bgugi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Creative thoughts, but the exact definitions don’t track (from GINA):

      Genetic information.–

      (A) In general.–The term “genetic information” means, with respect to any individual, information about–

      (i) such individual’s genetic tests,

      (ii) the genetic tests of family members of such individual, and

      (iii) the manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of such individual.

      (B) Inclusion of genetic services and participation in genetic research.–Such term includes, with respect to any individual, any request for, or receipt of, genetic services, or participation in clinical research which includes genetic services, by such individual or any family member of such individual.

      © Exclusions.–The term “genetic information” shall not include information about the sex or age of any individual.

      • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Are you being sarcastic? Or does being rejected for a job for being ‘too young’ fall under a different discrimination law?
        (Genuine question, i have no idea)

        • ramble81
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          It doesn’t qualify as a type of discrimination that is federally protected. Suprising isn’t it?

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I doubt it - your age isn’t determined by your genetics. The family medical history part is so that someone doesn’t fire you (or not hire you) for things like your mom having a kind of cancer that is hereditary. As a manager, if one of my employees tells me their mom has cancer, I’m not allowed to ask what kind.