• weeeeum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      You also have to admit that the US covers for most of the worlds military. Most of nato and many Asian allies have very low defense spending, because the US will cover them. Most of the time when there is a global crisis or localized crisis the US is involved in one way or another.

      • Ibex0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        They should pay us for this service.

        “Hey France, are you subscribed to the American security apparatus?”

        • misophist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I was shooting heroin and reading “The Fountainhead” in the pilothouse of my privately owned aircraft carrier when a call came in. I put a quarter in the radio to activate it. It was France. “Hey France, are you subscribed to the American security apparatus?”

        • SheeEttin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          They’re supposed to be paying into NATO, but I don’t think any country is actually meeting their full NATO commitment.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            France will be fine because they’re surrounded by allies and Russia can’t conquer Europe no matter how much Soviet surplus they run out of.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      we need to reel in the international shipping industry, the fashion industry, and also the global war machine

      Believe you mean “modernize” and not “reel in,” because ending international shipping would be catastrophic worldwide.

      • Fedop@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        If we’re being pedantic, the post said “reel in” international shipping, not “ending”.