• etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    You’re saying it usually does not function properly as a means of buying and selling control over companies? Because Musk bought his first big piece of Twitter on the stock market. That’s an example of the stock market working as intended. I would argue that this is how the stock market usually works. This is not gambling. This is the purchase of a tangible asset.

    • tsonfeir
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It does not function to improve the economy.

        • tsonfeir
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          One where the benefits of economic growth are distributed broadly across society, allowing everyone to contribute to and benefit from economic prosperity.

          • etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            You are describing what should be done with a powerful economy. Not how to create a powerful economy. Abolishing the stock market will not encourage wealth distribution. It will make the economy weaker, and could easily make wealth concentration worse.

            The right move is to reform the stock market, imposing rules on company ownership. That’s why I brought up Germany. All companies in Germany above a certain size must be 40% owned by their employees.

            • tsonfeir
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Agree to disagree. But I do like the part about Germany.