• conditional_soup
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Okay, yes, the projects. So, here’s the thing: the US used commie blocks as kind of a dumping ground for the poor, while simultaneously cutting services to those areas of the city in order to provide services to the suburbs. Not only that, but a lot of folks who lived in the projects were moved there after the government demolished their homes and mixed-use, walkable communities to put in interstates; so the government just uprooted whole ass communities, destroyed their wealth, and plunked them down all together with no opportunities. There’s a lot to go into about what went wrong with the projects, but it wasn’t the commie blocks; Americans aren’t uniquely incapable of living in them. BanksRail did a really good summary on it recently that goes into more depth than I have hear without being a whole college lecture on the matter, if you’re interested: https://youtu.be/dwK3oRT02k8?si=uki9afrjTdgwyq4N

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I agree with you, that’s why I said the US shouldn’t do them and integrate low income homes into all communities. It helps them lift themselves out of poverty, which is the point.